FJ40 shackle angle/ Do I need new springs? (2 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

this is the other way for breaking in stiff springs

P1010297.webp


P1000119.webp
 
Krondor,

Ideally the shackle should meet the spring at a right angle. Your front doesn't look too bad; the rear is definitely bad. I don't think adding longer shackles will do anything to improve that, but if the truck is not yet at its full GVW I'd load it first and then evaluate. I suspect it will still be sub-optimal.
 
you have skyjacker springs

you will need a longer rear shackles .... skyjackers arch has always been tight like that... you will get alot more weight on the back besides 100 lbs... spare tire carrier.... spare.... needless junk... people... and its the overall weight as well... they will settle a bit as well

make sure shackles are not tight either

I have had my skyjackers for over 20 years with maybe 200,000 miles on them... its a VERY nice soft ride now

not sure your statement on the Skyjackers being naturally tight is correct - I have never had a problem (inherited my truck from the PO with 4" Skyjackers, and also installed a new Skyjacker set of 4" springs in the rear several years ago) - my shackles are the anti-inversion-type from 4-Plus (not all that much longer than stock)
 
Last edited:
Hangers on the frame are 42.5" c-c
4"skyjacker springs is 45.5" c-c
Stock shackles is 2.75" it is too short and bottomed out and stop compression before the spring get flat , not good ,its the bump stop job to stop compression ,not the shackles job.
3.5" - 4" c-c shackles is ideal

see the place where it hit the hanger with stock shackle like @rkymtnflyfisher point erlier

20200110_163141.jpg


20200110_162956.webp
 
Last edited:
What is causing this? I have a new HFS lift from cool cruisers and with the leveling block it still leaned a bit, so I made one 5/8' thick for the RR passenger side and it is better but still off about 1/2 inch. What I've noticed is that the LR shackle angle is a good bit more than the RR shackle angle and bottoms out on the spring and starting to dent it. The shackles I have are the "H" type from CCOT. I measured the springs CC and they are the same as well as the spring mounts left and right and they are the same. swapped the springs around and it's the same result....Left rear doesn't change! Should the Left rear be re-arched a bit?

PXL_20250607_132649354.webp
 
Slight slope in the ground, load in truck, tightness of shackles. If you say you swapped springs side to side and got same then its either the front hangers are in fact not in the same spot or there is more load on driver side, or that pass side shackle is tight. I will say that a slight diff on the lawn will do that to mine and I always look and think " why is that shackle so diff from the other, but if on flat ground its load.
Curious what the front shackles look like when the backs are diff like that ?
 
No, it's on perfectly flat shop floor, shackles are not overly tight, measurements from front hanger eye to rear are the same on both side as well as the springs before installation. Front shackles have the same angle. It sat basically the same with the 33x10.50x15 BFG mud spare installed. Spring mounts have never been removed and all measures seem to be equal.
Very odd to me
 
Spring mounts have never been removed and all measures seem to be equal.

Can you take some better pictures of the welds and rivets on your spring mounts?
 
I looked at that too Matt, it appears to be in stock location none the less. I say again, if you have swapped springs side to side and still same result . it's load.
It was posted that a shackle should be at a right angle to spring, lets be clear, thats not striaght up & down, thats at a 90* angle to the surface of leaf
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom