Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I was on the fence with Victory vs Coastal's diy. It has more mounting points and closes off the bottum a bit more, but time for fitting, welding, finishing, and coating was just out of the ballpark for me at this time...Victory is pretty close to me and their products are intriguing, but I have not heard many praises of their products. The Tundra guys have had various issues with them including winch bumpers bending. Pretty sure the company was even banned from the Tundra forums. This isn’t some Chinese bumper off Alibaba so don’t blame your ocd, it doesn’t fit right. I would love to drive up there and pick up some armor, but so far I just can’t get on board. As far as the hitch I will measure my oem hitch depth later today, but I think it is roughly the same. I have found it to be too shallow as well.
I had the same thing happen with my rear bumper from metal tech .. went on there twisted. I had to tweak shim and jack to get it on there halfway straight. It's not right so I used rubber seal material to hide it. This is a complaint.. when one considers the cost of the bumper.. and then the work involved with install. If the manufacturer would consider "normalizing" (look it up) after build up. We would not have such issues.. anyway.. thats my rant for today. Thanks for reading.He messed with it more and got a 1/4" thick washer between the bottom mounting holed and the frame, to get a little more even line and more space at the rear,
View attachment 3379210View attachment 3379211
but it's a bit off horizontally matching the body lines, but probably not to other people, my friends assure me... ATD is my curse (attention to detail), or is it OCD?
Installer said it's maxed down in the mounting holes (ovals to allow left-right fitment), and to me it's just a scosh off to the driver.
View attachment 3379214
And speaking to the fit part, the opening for the door could be brought in 1/4" to 1/2" inch on each side. This may better cover the body pinch seams and just make it a little tighter to the door lines.
So...I may try to see if I can mess with fitment some (or maybe not ... Try slipping the spacer plates between the bumper and the frame to nudge it down a little in the rear, but then the 4 mounting holes may not align with the threaded hole in the frame. There are braces which bolt to the frame rail and support the forward sides by the wheel wells, but I think those will limit left-right movement, they determine placement of the forward sides of the bumper and would be the pivot point for any potential downward adjustment in the rear. I think that's limited by the rear mounting holes in the frame, but the bumper's holes could be wobbled I suppose, but then that would effect the underside mounting firmness to the frame...
View attachment 3379216 View attachment 3379217
The hitch design looks strong (I wouldn't say to the same rating as a factory frame-mounted hitch, and arguably not even a factory frame rail-mounted pintle hitch) but it's awfully shallow! It's too shallow for my bike rack (requires 3 3/8" depth from center of pin hole), but with the barn door I kind of need a swing-out anyway.
I also question the style over function design of the hitch reinforcement. it's a vertical plate rather than a flat plate of steel wrapping the edge of the receiver opening. With flat plate, it would slide better on departure angle, I fear with this vertical design, it'll catch and bend. Plus this vertical design effects the use of standard anti-rattle devices...
View attachment 3379222
View attachment 3379225
View attachment 3379223
I'm considering welding on another 3/4" to 1" of tube to the insert it deeper, and I don't think that would appreciably effect departure angle...plus I could wrap that lip with flat plate like standard hitches.
View attachment 3379221
The shallow receiver supported a 250# worth of bike rack shenanigans (Rak Attach swing-out 55#, Velocirax rack 100#, and 4 bikes circa 100+#) well enough on a 2000+ mile road trip but there is slight up-down movement in the swing-out and there's some twisting movement because of the weight of the rack (plus bikes).
I modded the Rak Attach to have a threaded clamping pin, but the shallow receiver allows for some up-down slop in the insert even with my clamping receiver pin mod, so movement gets amplified by the swingout, bike rack's mass and weight of bikes on local trails.
View attachment 3379224
blahblahblah,
This isn't intended as a gripe rant, it's a collection of observations leading back to one of the great mottos: "things come okay, but we can make them better!"
sweet exhaust tip!
Ditto. But now better DA that with the bolt-on receiver. LolI measured my factory hitch today and it was 4.25” deep so pretty close to the Victory. I have a hitch rack that I have a similar issue with, but also have a spare tire under there so there is not much room for extra depth.
View attachment 3380233
I swapped the failed one with a used stock takeoff.So, you swapped both rear air springs with new Arnott bags?
Or you went with used ones from others take offs?
I didn’t quite get how strong your faith in factory old bags was.
YDM!I told you it was easy!