It is a brand new motor, and may take a bit to burn the stuff off from the build
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Yea, I have never had a brand new engine before.It is a brand new motor, and may take a bit to burn the stuff off from the build
Yea, I have never had a brand new engine before.
When I get the cooling system done I will run it hard for a half hour or so and get it up to temp, then we will see where things stand.
I thought the way PurpleFJ62 is doing it is like stock. From his pictures, it looks like it follows all the stock mounting points and heat shields. Do you have a picture?
I like the adapter plate, where is this work being done? How was the reverse engineering done? Did you guys use a CMM or 3D scanner?No trying to hijack this but here is one a buddy made up, to run a NV4500, he has the plans for a toyota adapter, but said he does not want to make it
View attachment 2070871
View attachment 2070872
I know we spoke about this on the phone, but just to open up the dialogue to others who could chime in. My thoughts are that the mass airflow sensor could be the problem with the rough running. I recall the diameter of the tube you fit the sensor into being different than the factory supplied tube.
That style of mass airflow sensor is really more like a velocity sensor. As we know from Bernoulli's principle, if you decrease the diameter of that tube, the velocity will increase. Since that sensor is calibrated to the supplied tube size from the factory, then it will be telling the computer the incorrect mass flow of air being supplied to the engine.
You mentioned something about recalibrating it. If that doesn't work, my hunch would be flow separation across the sensor, but since you're nozzling the flow, I don't expect that to occur. Hopefully that sensor doesn't require a fully developed boundary layer, but perhaps recalibration would take care of that.
My question to the community is, what does the mass airflow sensor even do on a diesel? On a spark-ignited engine, it is required to know the mass of air entering the engine to determine how much fuel to inject, as we have to operate somewhere close to stoichiometric ratio. But this isn't true on a diesel. The amount of fuel and the timing at which it's injected determines how much power it makes; a diesel consumes about the same amount of air at a given RPM. What the hell is that thing used for anyway? Injection timing?
I like the adapter plate, where is this work being done? How was the reverse engineering done? Did you guys use a CMM or 3D scanner?
That exhaust system looks good. Did you keep the crankshaft center line in the same place with the 6BT swap? I could have squeezed the exhaust inside the frame rail but I figured I would take the original route, not sure why I did that.
Cummins provides a way to re-calibrate the MAF sensor for exactly this purpose, for people who are too stubborn to use their little aluminum intake tube and cone filter setup. It does require a complete cooling system so after that is done I can try the recal process.
Yesterday I took the sensor out of the MAF housing and changed its height with my hand while the engine was running, I could get the problem in the video to go away.
We shall soon find out. Bernoulli was a bad ass wasn't he!!
I suspect it is used to calculate the EGR mixing flow rate, however I did not read that in the manual. Engine also has an air intake throttle so it has even more control than engines of a previous generation. All this crap so our costalcrats can breath easily...Is the diameter of your mass flow housing smaller than the factory supplied one? Its possible you moved it into a slower part of the boundary layer, something closer to what it was calibrated for.
What is the MAF for anyway? Does the Cummins documentation say anything about that?
I think so the PCM would know how much the EGR was recirculating into the engine. And I believe it also works on some diesels in conjunction with the fueling to keep smoke down before the boost kicks in.Is the diameter of your mass flow housing smaller than the factory supplied one? Its possible you moved it into a slower part of the boundary layer, something closer to what it was calibrated for.
What is the MAF for anyway? Does the Cummins documentation say anything about that?