The 2018 GX has a stated 46.7 cubic feet behind the second row and the 2015 LX has a stated 41.1 cubic feet behind the second row. With 2nd row down, the LX states 83 and the GX states 65.
Is there really more cargo volume in the GX behind the 2nd row? This is contrary to every discussion online where owners state that LX has more cargo capacity. Based on the stats, that is only true with the 2nd row down. However, I don't think there's any debate there is more room behind the third row in the LX.... Is these things a Tardis or just different measurement methods?!
Many folks have guessed that it is due to the sliding 2nd row and the volume may be due to more 2nd row leg room in the LX. Stated legroom is only 0.3 inches more in the LX though - I don't see that accounting for a 10-15% difference... And either way, I would've expected the LX to have more volume behind the 2nd row than the GX, not equivalent.
Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks.
Is there really more cargo volume in the GX behind the 2nd row? This is contrary to every discussion online where owners state that LX has more cargo capacity. Based on the stats, that is only true with the 2nd row down. However, I don't think there's any debate there is more room behind the third row in the LX.... Is these things a Tardis or just different measurement methods?!
Many folks have guessed that it is due to the sliding 2nd row and the volume may be due to more 2nd row leg room in the LX. Stated legroom is only 0.3 inches more in the LX though - I don't see that accounting for a 10-15% difference... And either way, I would've expected the LX to have more volume behind the 2nd row than the GX, not equivalent.
Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks.