Builds What's a Parts Guy to Do?? (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Yes. Same place that machined the FW should be able to do it. They'll balance as a rotating assy, bolted together, then mark how it goes together, so you can reassemble in balanced config. The 3-2-1 hash on the FW correspond to the center-punch dots on the PP.

View attachment 966314 View attachment 966315


Never heard of balancing a pressure plate.
On a tractor anyways.
Can't hurt I guess.
 
The PP is already well balanced by Aisin.
Balancing the FW, crank, rods & pistons is nice, they are not real close from the factory.

For serviceability, it is preferred to balance parts parts individually. If not, when one part is changed at a later date the balance is off. IOW, zero balance the FW, then attach PP and zero balance again, only drilling metal off the PP. Now the FW is zero balanced and so is the PP. When the release bearing seizes up & saws through the PP, necessitating PP replacement, it will not require rebalancing the FW.
 
Correct. I did test fit the pulley after installation.

:)
Although there is certainly more than one way to skin a cat, there is no way to install the timing cover with a screwdriver if it is installed according to the recommendations in the manual. The harmonic balancer goes on and stays on while all the little timing cover bolts are then snugged up...with a wrench. No way a screwdriver can reach most of the bolts.
I just feared that the timing cover was not centered perfectly with the harmonic balancer and there could be an oil leak after all is said and done. The HB has to be dead center with the oil seal.
But it was probably installed the correct way, and the HB was removed after installing the cover for the picture...
 
The PP is already well balanced by Aisin.
Balancing the FW, crank, rods & pistons is nice, they are not real close from the factory.

For serviceability, it is preferred to balance parts parts individually. If not, when one part is changed at a later date the balance is off. IOW, zero balance the FW, then attach PP and zero balance again, only drilling metal off the PP. Now the FW is zero balanced and so is the PP. When the release bearing seizes up & saws through the PP, necessitating PP replacement, it will not require rebalancing the FW.

Jim,
Have I told you how smooth my 2F runs lately?
Cause it does.:hillbilly:
 
Lovin' the Husky toolbox and Craftsman screwdriver. I have to remember you're a parts guy, not a professional technician...but you do nice work.


:lol: Very true. I am very far from being a professional technician.... Those who know me personally *definitely* know that.

:lol:
 
The PP is already well balanced by Aisin.
Balancing the FW, crank, rods & pistons is nice, they are not real close from the factory.

For serviceability, it is preferred to balance parts parts individually. If not, when one part is changed at a later date the balance is off. IOW, zero balance the FW, then attach PP and zero balance again, only drilling metal off the PP. Now the FW is zero balanced and so is the PP. When the release bearing seizes up & saws through the PP, necessitating PP replacement, it will not require rebalancing the FW.

Is this knowledge that one only gains through experience or common amongst engine builders?
 
The PP is already well balanced by Aisin.
Balancing the FW, crank, rods & pistons is nice, they are not real close from the factory.

For serviceability, it is preferred to balance parts parts individually. If not, when one part is changed at a later date the balance is off. IOW, zero balance the FW, then attach PP and zero balance again, only drilling metal off the PP. Now the FW is zero balanced and so is the PP. When the release bearing seizes up & saws through the PP, necessitating PP replacement, it will not require rebalancing the FW.
Does balancing/not balancing the FW and PP during new clutch install mitigate/cause piston slap?

I'm noticing what I believe to be piston slap right after cold start and until the engine reaches operating temperature, and I wonder if that might be attributed to an unbalanced FW PP as a result of the latest clutch job...and if it might be alleviated by balancing the FW and PP at next clutch job...
 
Does balancing/not balancing the FW and PP during new clutch install mitigate/cause piston slap?

I'm noticing what I believe to be piston slap right after cold start and until the engine reaches operating temperature, and I wonder if that might be attributed to an unbalanced FW PP as a result of the latest clutch job...and if it might be alleviated by balancing the FW and PP at next clutch job...


:hmm:
 
Sorry for the hi-jack, beno...but it is related to the conversation, so I thought I'd seek further clarification while the clarification-getting is good...


No worries. I am interested in hearing any and all information that will make my work easier while at the same time producing the best results for long term reliability and operation.
 
I thought the whole balancing thing was different. I believe the components are all set to the same weight-ie all pistons machined to the weight of the lightest one, all con rods etc. Then the whole assembly including harmonic balancer and flywheel are assembled and spun to achieve a machined rotating balance. Then the engine gets assembled. I may be wrong here so maybe JimC or others can educate us lay people.

In this case, the block is already together, and the HB is factory balanced, so all you can really do is the flywheel/clutch. Let's be real here. This isn't an F1 motor spinning at 15000 rpm. This is going to spin at 3000 rpm once in awhile. If care has been taken in the assembly it will likely be fine. Was any balancing done by the shop and if so, what did they do?
 
The pistons and rods were all balanced with each other, IIRC. I do know that the crankshaft also had a slight bit of material taken off of the counterweights when they worked on it.
 
^^Got some parts back from powdercoating...

So Beno, I see that the timing gear cover got powder coated. I chickened out PCing mine & ended up painting it with RustSeal... cuz I was nervous that the solder holding the seal retainer in the cover would melt in the PC oven... So it turned out well for you? Please take a look at it's orientation in the cover and let all of us know that it turned out just fine.... pretty please? I would have much preferred to have PC it.
Thanks!

Sorry for the late reply on this question, but yes, everything was fine. The seal fit in perfectly and no issues whatsoever.
 
So I've got a part quandary that I never thought I'd have.

I have 2 HG's im able to use. The correct one (11115-61030) doesn't seem to have te correct cut outs for the water jacket holes in the block.

The incorrect one has three out of the 4 water jacket cutouts correct but like the later one closes off the one toward the front of the block on the DS.

:hmm:

Below, early 2F for FJ60 (top) and correct for my build HG on the bottom....

Perplexed by this since it just does not make sense to make a HG and close off a water jacket hole.

What says the Greek chorus?

image.jpg


Notice they are correctly oriented as if you were looking down on the top of the block from the DS.

Top one only has three out of 4 cut outs for water jacket at all 4 corners.

Bottom one only has 2 out of 4 with one being way too small for cutout on the block.

Disturbing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom