Cromagnon
SILVER Star
So...who is HaryV? MIT Dr. of thermo? It may be pointless to you but I can appreciate a good discussion on anything 40 related.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I would love to see the documentation on this. As I was taught, conduction is the mechanical transference of thermal energy. Here is a direct quote from Serway and Beichner's PHYSICS 5th edition, " Conduction, convection, and radiation are the three forms of thermal energy transfer. Conduction involves direct contact with molecules, convection involves moving hot particles, and the motion of electromagnetic waves involves radiation. "Heat is energy and and is transferred by photons. There is no other way energy gets from one place to another, conduction included.
I'm not a physicist, my thinking is that all these transferals happen at the quantum level and involve fields.I would love to see the documentation on this. As I was taught, conduction is the mechanical transference of thermal energy. Here is a direct quote from Serway and Beichner's PHYSICS 5th edition, " Conduction, convection, and radiation are the three forms of thermal energy transfer. Conduction involves direct contact with molecules, convection involves moving hot particles, and the motion of electromagnetic waves involves radiation. "
in that sense, my statement does not conflict with Serway and Beichner.
Just tried to understand wave-particle duality in "Quantum Mechanics: An Introduction", Greiner, where he states "current scientific theory holds that all particles exhibit a wave nature and vice versa." He circles around the subject so it appears that if you are inside the circle you see one thing and if you are outside the circle you see something different but in reality they are the same. My physics proffesor gave me that book in '06 and I never opened it until today. Now my head hurts too!!!I'm not a physicist, my thinking is that all these transferals happen at the quantum level and involve fields.
AFAIK fields involve quaunta, aka photons.
So, in that sense, my statement does not conflict with Serway and Beichner.
HaryV is a character from the bowels of chit-chatSo...who is HaryV? MIT Dr. of thermo? It may be pointless to you but I can appreciate a good discussion on anything 40 related.
Sorry the humor was lost on me, it must have been a good read from the sound of things.HaryV is a character from the bowels of chit-chat
Out of curiosity I checked out a few of those chit chat threads. No need...Sorry the humor was lost on me, it must have been a good read from the sound of things.
Sorry the humor was lost on me, it must have been a good read from the sound of things.
Out of curiosity I checked out a few of those chit chat threads. No need...
It's a whole different circus over in chat. Not the kind for kids either.
To back up Steamer's point, the radiator and engine don't know how fast the coolant is moving. Heat is transferred by photons.
More of the photons move at the speed of light from an area of higher heat to an area of less heat. About the only thing that can
interrupt that effect is an insulating layer of air or vapor. The turbulence from faster flow ought to minimize this.
I think you are confusing radiant vs conduction. A liquid cooled engine is definitely utilizing conduction not radiant thermal transference.
Heat is energy and and is transferred by photons. AFAIK there is no other way energy gets from one place to another, conduction included.
However, I am not a physicist and I'm willing to hear from anyone who is informed on this subject.
The way I see it, and how it is pertinent to this thread, is that the exchange of heat happens in such a way that as the speed of the coolant
through the engine and cooling system increases there is no logical way it will reduce that exchange.
I'm happy for the correction - the knowledge is useful and I find the subject interesting.Sorry but not correct about the photons or the "...don't know how fast the coolant is flowing" because they do in a way. Correct about the turbulence.
x2
Photons......that's kinda funny. Here is an excerpt for your reading pleasure:
In conduction and convection, heat is transferred by movement of electrons, vibrational energy, and collisions of molecules and atoms, not by photons. In heat transfer by radiation, photons do carry the energy. The photon can be absorbed by increasing rotational or vibrational quantized energy levels, not just electronic energy levels.
In heat transfer, the more turbulent the flow at the boundary layer of the fluid, the more effective the heat transfer. If you needed the coolant to "go slow" why don't you need the air on the other side of the radiator to "go slow"? Because you don't. You want both to go fast as possible so that there is not a laminar boundary layer at the metal surface on either side which slows down heat transfer considerably.
I'm happy for the correction - the knowledge is useful and I find the subject interesting.
I stand by my statement that the engine/radiator do not know how fast the coolant is going.
My point was that there is no correlation between the flow rate and cooling (unless it is standing still or so slow it starts boiling).
That was stated poorly by me. I meant to restate that there is no reduction in cooling with an increase in flow rate as I previously posted.Sorry but there is a direct correlation. If you want to do your own research just google "laminar vs turbulent flow heat transfer". I think you will quickly see the correlation. Here's the first thing that pops up:
Turbulent flow, due to the agitation factor, develops no insulating blanket and heat is transferred very rapidly. Turbulent flow occurs when the velocity in a given water channel is high. ... Laminar flow develops an insulating blanket around the channel wall and restricts heat transfer.