What is your desire spring wise?Simplistically so…until it doesn’t perform as desired.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
What is your desire spring wise?Simplistically so…until it doesn’t perform as desired.
Well that depends on which application. A relatively short range vehicle intended more more toward extreme off-road or something driveable/tolerable for cross-country yet still accommodating for moderate off-road. At either rate the characteristics should be such that the lift height for a given weight is consistent across multiple manufacturing runs to avoid unanticipated additional modifications relative to solving driveline issues, rake, or lean. That consistency depends on maintaining spec for gauge, turn pitch, overall barrel diameter, carbon content, and management of the heat treatment during processing.What is your desire spring wise?
Have you ever scaled it for actual axle weights? BTW nice looking rigNew VTs are in (144s and 145s). Front ended up exactly where I'd expect. Rear ended up about an inch high. Might pull the rear spacers if the rear doesn't settle with some driving and gear in the back.
View attachment 2679648
Next to 3" Icons:
View attachment 2679649
View attachment 2679650
Fronts installed w/ 1" spacer
View attachment 2679651
Stance w/ 1" spacers front and rear
View attachment 2679652
Not yet - Want the new motor and transmission in first, since they should be lighter.Have you ever scaled it for actual axle weights? BTW nice looking rig
Thought about your setup last night and trying to figure how I have an extra inch of lift with just the springs alone here. One, obvious, I'm still on the light side but I think the 6" MRR's are adding another 1"-1.5" lift on the front. Set them per spec but thinking I'm on the light end of their setting so have to soften them up which probably has nothing to do with static height and, man these suckers did not like to be collapsed by hand. Pretty convinced until broken in I will be setting high. Thought it was funny that others mentioned shocks would add lift but I'm now a believer.
Not sure if the HuddExpo guys have had experience with the MRR and the VT's and have seen the same thing? Will it settle in?
If the spring wire is actually tapered at the top of the spring = old VTs. If the spring wire is uniform diameter - new VTs.In the process of installing C97-146/147VT's and MRA shocks - will report back on now it all works out.
Front's are In and will be doing the rears this weekend.
Unsure how to validate if I got the old VT's vs the new.
No direct experience with the MRR unfortunately, but I am one of the guys in the camp of "shocks can't add lift", but I am also a guy who can be swayed by solid data.
If you have a heavy truck, the Dobinsons VTs seem to work well.Thanks for posting up and sharing all this information, guys. I was ready some Dob's springs, and now my head is really spinning. I mean that seriously, I appreciate your posts. It's very helpful, although I'm not really sure what to order at this point. Bummer...
We now have our second local truck with these new VT's installed and should have the 3rd one done today and then 4th done shortly after. From what we are seeing, the new VT is much better suited to a heavy rig unless you want a pretty tall lift. I can tell you however, they ride much better than to old flexi's or old VT's on these heavier rigs, even with their yellow shocks. I expect my personal rig to have right at 4" of lift with these new VT's but that is probably a week away and when I will do a lot of measuring/photos.Thanks for posting up and sharing all this information, guys. I was ready some Dob's springs, and now my head is really spinning. I mean that seriously, I appreciate your posts. It's very helpful, although I'm not really sure what to order at this point. Bummer...
I have a weird feeling they cut production on the OG tapered coils because they were a pain to get consistent. I’m running the 2.5” tapered coils and I get a solid 4” with the 80 weighing 6300 lbs. I talked to one of the dobinsons reps for a month and sent him every measurement I could on the springs. He ended up telling me that the lift height I was getting was completely different than what the spring calculator predicted it should be. It seems like these spring can give anywhere from 2” to 4” of lift and despite the weight of the 80. They’re amazing springs despite getting random lift heights, I wouldn’t trade mine for anything else. But I bet they got tired of the complaints, more complicated production, and the cost
That's always been the rule. The 3"-3.5" VT coils were always listed for heavy loaded vehicles. Lighter rigs won't compress the coils as much and end up with more liftAgain, I am betting the new "rule" will end up being light rig=flexi's and heavy rig=new VT's.
Yeah, but you know MUD.That's always been the rule. The 3"-3.5" VT coils were always listed for heavy loaded vehicles. Lighter rigs won't compress the coils as much and end up with more lift