TreadingLight
"Overlanding is Sh*t"
- Thread starter
- #61
That all makes sense to me. I've driven some Saginawed 40s on 35s but never compared them to one with a Yota box. This is some good food for thought. If I can figure out the parts needed and talk my buddy into it this is the route I'd go.
I'm still not sold on the 60 axles. The benefits make sense. It sounds like the effort isn't a big difference - out boarding the springs / notching the housing is not that much more complex. But I'd like to keep the rig "compact". Still considering.
This is not a very popular configuration these days but what do y'all think about a low SOA on 33s with narrow axles?
I'd have the body clearance and articulation of the SOA, a bit less height so more stable on narrow axles, and the differences with axle clearance between 33s and 35s isn't much.
I'm still not sold on the 60 axles. The benefits make sense. It sounds like the effort isn't a big difference - out boarding the springs / notching the housing is not that much more complex. But I'd like to keep the rig "compact". Still considering.
This is not a very popular configuration these days but what do y'all think about a low SOA on 33s with narrow axles?
I'd have the body clearance and articulation of the SOA, a bit less height so more stable on narrow axles, and the differences with axle clearance between 33s and 35s isn't much.