Thank you so much.I apoligize, I looked at your number wrong... you are correct.
Your 40's most likely birthday is Thursday November 2nd, 1973
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Thank you so much.I apoligize, I looked at your number wrong... you are correct.
Your 40's most likely birthday is Thursday November 2nd, 1973
Thanks man! Appreciate the effort you’re putting into all this!Your 40 would be really hard to pinpoint a day of birth because by 1983 Toyota was only producing around 350 FJ40s a month. In previous years they were producing more than a thousand a month meaning around 100 a day. They would have most likely had the 40 in production every day of the month whereas by 1983 Toyota probably only had the 40 in production for one week that month, so determining which week that would have been is virtually impossible. That being said, I will see what I can find out.
Congrats on having a late model "rare" FJ40!!
I am building a spreadsheet with all the data so eventually I should be able to look up a VIN very quickly. I appreciate the encouragement. I have your number in the queue.I don't know how long you can keep this up! But:
FJ40153362
Your 40's most likely birthday is Tuesday April 22nd 1980This is fun.
322628
Yes!@DirtDauberGarage
Would an original sales invoice from Toyota Nagoya and Customer help you out to collect more info?
Awesome, thanks Dirt!Your 40's most likely birthday is Tuesday April 22nd 1980
Your 40's most likely birthday is Friday August 21st, 1970.Hey @DirtDauberGarage Here’s ours:
FJ4088644. Thanks.
Thanks! Oh great, it looks like we have a born on a Friday vehicle. That may explain a few things.Your 40's most likely birthday is Friday August 21st, 1970.
One puzzling observation is that Toyota manufactured approximately 450 fewer units of the 40 series during that particular month compared to the preceding and subsequent months. Despite diligent research, no historical events were uncovered that could explain this production fluctuation or suggest disruptions in supply chains at that time.
One thought I had is that Toyota introduced the all-new 1971 Celica in October of 1970. Therefore, it is conceivable that they were increasing production for the Celica, potentially reallocating some Land Cruiser resources such as factory workers and assembly line time to facilitate the launch of the Celica.
A reduction of 450 Land Cruisers equates to basically a week's worth of production, indicating a possible pause in Land Cruiser manufacturing to focus on producing the Celica. Both the Celica and the LC were produced in the same plant in 1970-1971 (Toyota's Takaoka Plant, which was located in Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture, Japan.)
This deviation could impact the accuracy of determining the Birthday of anyone's FJ40 during August 1970 compared to other months.
See an eariler post where I explain my process.@DirtDauberGarage
Thanks for telling us our trucks probable birthdays via our Vehicle Identification Numbers.
Curious how you do that based off the VINs?
I’m curious what other info, if any, is available from our Vehicle Identification Numbers.
Thanks again,
Ian
Found.See an eariler post where I explain my process.
The early VIN# really only tells you year and month it was manufactured. The fender or firewall tag will tell you much more (Paint color, transmission info, etc.)@DirtDauberGarage
Thanks for telling us our trucks probable birthdays via our Vehicle Identification Numbers.
Curious how you do that based off the VINs?
I’m curious what other info, if any, is available from our Vehicle Identification Numbers.
Thanks again,
Ian
This August 1973 FJ40 VIN is still in the 15xxxx series.My gut says that Toyota decided to round up the VINs and start at 160001 with the August 1973 LC because this was by far the most upgrades made to the FJ40 in one month since its original inception making it the “most improved” FJ40 yet.
When you include the upgrades added in 1974, which Toyota most certainly knew was coming, you could almost make a case that this was a FJ40 2.0 or what could be called a “second generation” FJ40.
Thoughts???