/this\
and I just got a tow out of BFE (not in a cruiser) - just for the record: it IS survivable
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
The material used in the 1FZ head gasket has been non-asbestos since the beginning of production. It is a graphite based material which makes an excellent head gasket. It is also rather expensive compared to some other options. Back in the late 80's when asbestos loaded materials were being replaced with non-asbestos material, the domestic manufacturers weren't interested in paying the additional cost to go to a full graphite gasket. They wanted a material that cost the same or less than the asbestos material. Those materials kind'a sucked. Additionally there was a movement to get away from solvent based adhesives and replace them with water based adhesives. Those too sucked. The combination of non-asbestos paper and water based glue made for some really crappy gasket products. Fortunately, Toyota didn't go that route with the 1FZ.
My opinion is that the HG failures on the 1FZ are primarily due to the straight 6 configuration using an aluminum head and a iron block that results in differential thermal expansion. I think there is a version of the 1FZ using an iron head in South America. It'd be interesting to see if those have any HG issues after this many years. It does appear that most HG problems in North American FZJ80's start slowly and will consume some coolant before a massive failure. Some, however, may simply present as a massive failure. If you daily drive the vehicle short distances, then a surprise failure might not be a big deal. If you take your Cruiser on a 1000 mile vacation and want the peace of mind that your HG is healthy, you might want to do the work when you can plan for it.
Thanks again guys, you have convinced me, I won't mess with it. I do not have signs of failure, just wrapping up baseline on this thing basically, and thought it may be worth doing.
So second question, is the valve cover even doable without removing the intake plenum, I'm getting a mixed message on that. Any tricks to checking the EGR vacuum switch, I suspect that is causing the EGR code.
Thanks again guys, you have convinced me, I won't mess with it. I do not have signs of failure, just wrapping up baseline on this thing basically, and thought it may be worth doing.
So second question, is the valve cover even doable without removing the intake plenum, I'm getting a mixed message on that. Any tricks to checking the EGR vacuum switch, I suspect that is causing the EGR code.
What he said