That's a silly comment.Not sure they should keep the LC name, rather have them call it a Prado. Agree with others an LC is not like anything else the built; at least my 100 vs anything from that period.
The "Prado" is a Land Cruiser. So is the 70 series and the 300. Those are all "Land Cruiser" brands. But they are different classes in Toyota's own hierarchy. Light Duty, Heavy Duty, and Station Wagon, respectively. So you are correct in the sense that the 250 is the Prado lineage, because quite literally it is the next model in the "Light Duty" series replacing the 150. It's just not called Prado in the US.
To keep this on topic to the 100 series forum, to expect similarities from the Light Duty 250 Land Cruiser is nonsense in comparison to our Station Wagon 100 Land Cruiser (or 200 series, or 300 series - all Station Wagon) They simply are not the same class of car in Toyota's own line up. You're jumping to another platform.
We all recognized that Toyota was not selling a Land Cruiser chock full of luxury features (The 200) and instead the Lexus was picking up that clientele. And we all heard the rumors that they were pivoting to release a more 'robust' platform to fill a perceived niche. So does it make any sense that Toyota would've built this off-road version from the ever more costlier to go to market GA-F platform? No. They would've been stuck in the same unprofitable, strategic nightmare they were trying to avoid in the first place.
Apples and oranges.
Last edited: