I felt the same way when it came to the rear DC shaft. 1310 is comparable to the front not to mention there are two joints at the transfer case where there used to be only one. Mine has run the rubicon several times and no problems since I had it built in 2014.Tatton was a cool guy, but I'm not feeling the 1310 spicers I Want to stick with Toyota stuff.
Thanks for the link, looks informative so far.
Last year I went to slee 4" HDP rear springs and then had rear vibrations. I sourced a 2002 4Runner rear DC shaft and took it to the driveline shop for them to use in building my rear shaft. This shop has been around for over three decades and I have done a lot of business with them over that's 20 years so I trusted them when they presented me with the NeapCo DC and the spicer life time joints (which I have used in other applications with great success).
When sitting side by side with the Toyota DC these parts look very comparable. This shop builds many shafts for many applications and I don't think they would steer me wrong.
Toyota drive shafts are very over built and notoriously strong which lends to their long life. The rear UJoint's in our stock 80 series drive line are monsters for the application.
A 1350 series U joint is considered 1 ton in the rock crawling fab world. The bearing cap diameter on the stock land cruiser rear U joint measure 1/10th" larger than the 1350 series. That's very large for a vehicle that will never weigh, even loaded up, as much as my 7200# dodge pickup which has U joints only a little larger than the land cruiser rear shaft has.
The 1310's probably won't last as long as the stock Toyotas but I don't believe I will break them either. Actually, they will probably last longer than the vibrating stock rear shaft would. Now having said all this, I will carry my spare rear shaft when I go on those tougher trails especially when a long way from home or services. Driving style makes a big difference here.