To my knowledge, the Duramax isn't offered as a crate motor. And I wasn't promoting a Duramax 2.8/FJ80 engine swap. I was just making the comparison that the Cummins R2.8 seems underpowered compared to other similarly sized diesel engines.
Cummins has always used that tactic. Lower total power from the factory to create epic reliability. That's what made the 4bt and 6bt engines so great. (In my humble opinion)
I have 4.11 gears with 33's in mine and it does fine. The operating RPM range on this engine is identical to a 2F, it's very friendly. I'm going to change to 3.7 gears and 34" tires though because this thing is so torquey
To my knowledge, the Duramax isn't offered as a crate motor. And I wasn't promoting a Duramax 2.8/FJ80 engine swap. I was just making the comparison that the Cummins R2.8 seems underpowered compared to other similarly sized diesel engines.
Think the Duromax 2.8 has been around since 2011 and upgraded for smog in 2014. Also available as a 3.6, but I don’t know if it is interchangeable with the 2.8. Just thinking used availability? A 3.6 well massaged would certainly provide 30-50% more power than a stock 2.8. THAT would be some serious gitty up n go!!
200hp and 400tq at the wheels sounds pretty darn adequate. Albeit that's 2 wheels not 4, not going to break any land speed records, but along the lines of a strong supercharged 1fz with a little extra torque and fuel economy.
Definitely interested....they talked about this at the Cummins dealer meeting and i didnt rwalize how complete of a kit it was...my mind started turning.
It comes with wiring, ecm, throttle pedal and trimmed engine, so all you need is trans adapter and mounts.
Cummins has always used that tactic. Lower total power from the factory to create epic reliability. That's what made the 4bt and 6bt engines so great. (In my humble opinion)
200hp and 400tq at the wheels sounds pretty darn adequate. Albeit that's 2 wheels not 4, not going to break any land speed records, but along the lines of a strong supercharged 1fz with a little extra torque and fuel economy.
The peak torque of these motors used to be 1800 maybe its towards 2000rpm, I haven't looked on these newer motors. So for 37-40s you would most likely want 4.56s if you want to still have decent MPGs.
The peak torque of these motors used to be 1800 maybe its towards 2000rpm, I haven't looked on these newer motors. So for 37-40s you would most likely want 4.56s if you want to still have decent MPGs.
Yes, exactly. Peak torque by 1500rpm. Going much beyond 1800rpm the power will not be noticeably greater, but MPGs will go down significantly if above 2000rpm during normal highway cruising speeds.
Yes, exactly. Peak torque by 1500rpm. Going much beyond 1800rpm the power will not be noticeably greater, but MPGs will go down significantly if above 2000rpm during normal highway cruising speeds.
I have 4.11 gears with 33's in mine and it does fine. The operating RPM range on this engine is identical to a 2F, it's very friendly. I'm going to change to 3.7 gears and 34" tires though because this thing is so torquey
So this engine package isn’t really ideal for someone who wants to crawl as slow as possible with a stock trans and transfer case even with the current lowest low range gear set? Seems that way since you plan to run 3.7’s and 34” tides.
Just like a good attorney will never ask a question in court that he doesn't know the answer, Cummins would not have made such a bold PR move as this without have some initial data that it would work well. This looks very promising.
Does anyone know if the bolt pattern is the same as the 4BT/6BT?
It is no where near a 4bt or 6bt bolt pattern, the motor is completely different , in all aspects the adapter plate is completely different so are all of the outside components AC alternator power steering pump built for a RHD vehicle . My buddy has one in his shop, we have been talking about what to do with this thing. I will maybe post something soon after things are started