Builds 1996 HZJ75 Land Cruiser Pickup

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

@Will Van
ECB32-FB3-CC94-4-A63-A85-D-53775108-FF62.jpg
Do you know what the offset is on these wheels and where did you source them?

Thanks,
 
Last edited:
Wouldn’t a 6” wheel with 3.5” backspacing have 0.5” offset? A 7” wheel with 3.5” backspacing would be 0” offset.
 
Wouldn’t a 6” wheel with 3.5” backspacing have 0.5” offset? A 7” wheel with 3.5” backspacing would be 0” offset.

You have to include the overall wheel width. In reality 16X6" is actually 16X7".

It is a good rule of thumb to add 1" (1/2" for each flange) to get the overall wheel width but you can do physical measurements to be exact.

Excuse my poor handwriting.

calculation.JPG
 
Last edited:
You have to include the overall wheel width. In reality 16X6" is actually 16X7".

It is a good rule of thumb to add 1" (1/2" for each flange) to get the overall wheel width but you can do physical measurements to be exact.

Excuse my poor handwriting.

View attachment 2962331

Fwiw, the 60262 wheel is considered a 6" wide wheel

1648239405320.webp


1648239769428.webp
 
The stamped width is the inner width of the wheel only.

The flange portion is usually never part of what numbers is shown stamped on the wheel. The “J” is what takes the flange specs into consideration. Never seen it otherwise but I have been wrong many times. :)
 
Last edited:
The stamped width is the inner width of the wheel only.

The flange portion is usually never part of what numbers is shown stamped on the wheel. The “J” is what takes the flange specs into consideration. Never seen it otherwise but I have been wrong many times. :)

I see what your saying. I've never measured a wheel to include the flanges, only the actual width where the tire rides. I've always ordered custom or production wheels and/or sold them under the actual rim width as well. Flanges are somewhat irrelevant as there is no guarantee they are identical on each side no does their width have any impact on on tire fitting. Regardless of how one chooses to measure, they are in fact a 0 offset.

I do agree it's odd to measure the Rim Width from one point and the offset from another, but all the wheel companies I've ever worked with including Toyota do that.


1648244728877.png
 
I might be saying the same thing as others, but IME wheel width is measured bead to bead, not outer lip to outer lip. Offset is from the center line, so is independent from wheel width. And backspace is measured from mounting surface of the wheel to the edge of the lip (not the tire bead). So an 8” wheel and a 6” wheel that both have the same offset will have different backspace (by an inch).
 
I might be saying the same thing as others, but IME wheel width is measured bead to bead, not outer lip to outer lip. Offset is from the center line, so is independent from wheel width. And backspace is measured from mounting surface of the wheel to the edge of the lip (not the tire bead). So an 8” wheel and a 6” wheel that both have the same offset will have different backspace (by an inch).

Offset becomes positive, negative or simply "0" based off the mounting surface location from the center line. In the case of the Toyota steel wheel being discussed in this thread, it is "0". I posted up a simple formula to explain this earlier in this thread.

The image that @cruiseroutfit posted up is a good example. That wheel in the image is actually positive offset, not "0".

At this point, I think I need to bow out of this discussion and this is why I rarely get into wheel discussion because I have realized that everyone has a different idea how to measure. I am not saying anyone is right or wrong but it gets confusing.
 
Offset becomes positive, negative or simply "0" based off the mounting surface location from the center line. In the case of the Toyota steel wheel being discussed in this thread, it is "0". I posted up a simple formula to explain this earlier in this thread.

The image that @cruiseroutfit posted up is a good example. That wheel in the image is actually positive offset, not "0".

At this point, I think I need to bow out of this discussion and this is why I rarely get into wheel discussion because I have realized that everyone has a different idea how to measure. I am not saying anyone is right or wrong but it gets confusing.

Says the guy who does this for a living for Toyota. 😂😂

I’d say you are most likely 100% correct as Toyota is concerned. 👊👊
 
I do agree it's odd to measure the Rim Width from one point and the offset from another, but all the wheel companies I've ever worked with including Toyota do that.
not really, overall rim width where offset and backspacing is measured is actually the more important number to fitment on mechanical interference, like calipers, tire rods, steering arms ect.

the other number is more of a quick fit to a tire width range and how that tire will profile.

actually, reading what i wrote it is odd, one width would work
 
Last edited:
not really, overall rim width where offset and backspacing is measured is actually the more important number to fitment on mechanical interference, like calipers, tire rods, steering arms ect.

the other number is more of a quick fit to a tire width range and how that tire will profile.

I don't disagree, but many (most?) manufacturers including Toyota don't advertise or use the overall rim width. One must know they are using two different reference points which is exactly why this conversation has been happening ;)
 
…and now on to more important topics. Like how do I fit these 315/75/16 tires on my truck?

BD012693-2-A76-4-AE2-A279-059-F61-E13014.jpg
With those tires you won’t need to change the gears 😉
 
With those tires you won’t need to change the gears 😉
Haha! A bit of “rubber overdrive”.

Hopefully 315/75/16 tires and 3.7 gears won’t be too tall.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom