Wow, this is news to me, I always thought the 3F would be a better platform for higher revs due to 7 mains. Lots of turbo 3F engines down here in South America, I've been planning to do the same at some point. We just don't have the aftermarket support that Jeep 4.0, Chevy 292, and Ford 300 have to make a "built to snot" motor. There's a build on Powernation of the Ford 300 going from 88 HP to 270HP, by slightly upping compression, cam, lightly porting, bigger valves, better intake / exhaust / carb.. Which is a HUGE gain, but it was extremely restrictive to start out.
I've seen many builds using rods and pistons meant for engines other than the one being built. Finding a H-beam forged rod that will work with the 3F crank and forged pistons to suit shouldn't be that hard to do, even if some machining is required. If this was achieved, I'd build for boost, keeping compression low and gapping rings to .028. Some port work, hardened seats, bigger valves, headers, intake, and choice of carb / TBI running blow through would do nicely.
Non-USA 3F engines had carburetor intakes, so it's easy for me to adapt a Aces Fuel Injection TBI unit that is ready for boost, and easily tunable. I do not know the reliability of these units yet, but so far they seem to be top notch, and have a remote mounted ECU that isn't getting heat soaked by the engine. You couldn't pay me to install a Holley Sniper, unreliable s***e.
Offenhauser is apparently still manufacturing a 4 barrel intake manifold to suit the 2F, I am coming up short on finding any info on whether it is interchangeable with the 3F..
Offenhauser 6226-C Offenhauser C Series Intake Manifolds | Summit Racing - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/ofy-6226-c
For a turbo, I'd go with a Holset HX25 or max, a Super HX30W so you would have immediate spool and low end torque. Regardless of how I built the motor, I would keep it a low revving torquer with a cam and turbo to suit.
My .02
View attachment 3597720
View attachment 3597738