Here is some pics of 80 chassis rail to 79-series chassis rail. 80 is the thin rail.
79 is way beefier.
Cheers
79 is way beefier.
Cheers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
That thing looks mint compared to all the first gen tacoma's I have seen.
And then post 2016 they increased the size/width of the 70 series frame. The 70 series is the workhorse for sure.Here is some pics of 80 chassis rail to 79-series chassis rail. 80 is the thin rail.
View attachment 3036944View attachment 3036945View attachment 3036946View attachment 3036947
79 is way beefier.
Cheers
It’d be interesting to compare those to a Prado/Hilux and Tacoma frame. The frame on my 98 Taco was paper-thin compared to my LC.Here is some pics of 80 chassis rail to 79-series chassis rail. 80 is the thin rail.
View attachment 3036944View attachment 3036945View attachment 3036946View attachment 3036947
79 is way beefier.
Cheers
I believe the rust issues on the Tacoma's ran from 98 - 02
New frame replacements in Upstate NY.
My dealer there was doing 20-30 **a month** during the 4 years I was up there. 1 Master mechanic with helper, 2 lifts were able to do a frame swap in less than 20 billable hours. They were being paid 48 warranty billable hours **per truck** (Tacoma/Tundra/Sequoia).
This is just one dealer. Does not include the buy-backs that Toyota offers as an option.
View attachment 3037156
View attachment 3037157
View attachment 3037158
I appreciate the side by side comparison done by @SNLC, but does anyone know if there is a yield/tensile strength (grade) difference in the steels between what @SNLC showed us on the 79/80 frames?
When determining the overall strength of a chassis rail, tube, or pipe, thickness is only one of the variables affecting the overall strength of the member. The yield strength (grade) must also be considered in order for someone to compare apples to apples as to what is "better" or stronger.
Good to know. Which years?Tacoma frames dissolve because Dana made them and did a poor job of coating them.
When you're driving an 80, I figure the other guy brings your crumple zone with him...There is not much to deep dive into.
They are pretty much still manufactured as they have always been. Same presses, same plant, etc. The only things that have changed are the technologies used for welding and jig differences for final weld.
The only major changes have been regarding the use of materials in different parts of the frame to accommodate crumple zones for impact (regulatory changes, basically) and the use of high-tensile steel in certain areas of the frame.
Otherwise, the 70 series frame, for example, hasn't really changed much from the "minor changes" introduced in 2007 to accommodate the 1VD-FTV.
The recall years. I do not remember the range. Most of that went down after I retired. In addition I was in New Mexico and it was not an issue there.Good to know. Which years?
Around here that looks like a new car chassis that maybe went through 5 Chicago winters. Here’s a 2017 Highlander Hybrid with 66k that’s seen 4 Chicago winters.
@OGBeno said:
New frame replacements in Upstate NY.
My dealer there was doing 20-30 **a month** during the 4 years I was up there. 1 Master mechanic with helper, 2 lifts were able to do a frame swap in less than 20 billable hours. They were being paid 48 warranty billable hours **per truck** (Tacoma/Tundra/Sequoia).
How does the 70 series frame compare to 100/200?You should see the frame on a 70-series, significantly more beefy.
Older frames were riveted. This contributes to rust imho.
Cheers