I bet the compression was good due to the fact that the "grand canyon" trenches in the cylinder walls are on the lower 3rd of the stroke. Lets lots of oil in, but gets good compression.
subscribed!
subscribed!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I bet the compression was good due to the fact that the "grand canyon" trenches in the cylinder walls are on the lower 3rd of the stroke. Lets lots of oil in, but gets good compression.
subscribed!
subscribed
<i agree, keep to the facts, the readers can grasp the truth>
those groves in #6, what did cause them? broken ring or do you think they were there from before the last rebuild?
i had never heard of turning the butt end of a crank to remove the groving ... interesting.
With a little head mill and .75mm overbore, it shoulda been 165-175.being that the compression wasnt too far off....i wonder what the compression would have been...
thats far to bore it out...leaving no room for further rebuilds...are the pistons matching? or are they non-matching to the size of the cyls?
It's reasonable assumption that there was a problem in at least one cyl that required overboring the block. IOW, there's no reason to bore a good running engine.i wonder if the clys were scored and bad to begin with and they had to go that far...either way...too far
Dunno, haven't measured thickness yet. It's been run through the tank & oven so far. Now it can be magnafluxed & measured & built.has the head been shaved?
Wow, you're good.
I'm surprised pistons are so hard to source, is that just the way it is? I would think something like the crank/block would be a lot harder to come by? I always thought there were quality after-market options for pistons? Does Toyota still have the camshaft, etc.?
The dome top 75-80 pistons seem to be extinct. There were only two factories on the planet producing them recently. Now both of those factories have stopped.
There is a chance that the ITM source somewhere in Chicomm could restart production, but I was told that the factory was not seeing orders, so there was no planned re-intro date. But the same rep also said they are not seeing orders because people don't bother ordering when they are told the part is on indefinite hiatus. It's a death spiral of reduced demand/ reduced availability.
Very bad news. So we now have to drive them until they die and then scrap? What about 3FE pistons?
Yes, it is do-able.Kind of a newb question, but if one wanted to try to salvage the block and make it workable with pistons that might still be available (ie. less oversize) could you sleeve the cylinders like they to with diesels? Or is that just way too much work and expense given the availability and price for 'rebuild-able' short blocks, especially since so much of the rest of the motor needs to be replaced anyway?
What about 3FE pistons?
Yes, it is do-able.
And yes, it costs a lot of money to resleeve all 6 holes.
If it comes down to that, we will start using pistons for the GMC 270 (which the 2F is copied from). Same rods, crank, .990 wristpins but a 3.781 bore instead of 3.70 bore.
Or if we are gonna sleeve the blocks, might as well bore to water, then sleeve back down to 4.030 bore and install GMC 302 +.030 pistons for a 305CID engine.![]()