Dragos - I know it looks like you are having a conversation with yourself here but I appreciate the hard work and I am keeping a eye on this one. Thanks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Dragos - I know it looks like you are having a conversation with yourself here but I appreciate the hard work and I am keeping a eye on this one. Thanks!
It would be better if I can find the two transmissions at a junk yard and compare them at both ends to see if they actually match up.
Again A343 vs A650 for those who might want to help out and have the resources.
For $200 someone in PA could find out? Is this the same transmission you were considering?
AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION 01 02 03 04 05 LEXUS IS300 AUTO TORQUE CONVERTER IS 300 | eBay
Not affiliated - YMMV - etc...
Dragos - I know it looks like you are having a conversation with yourself here but I appreciate the hard work and I am keeping a eye on this one. Thanks!
Yes.
However, the V8 version is built up to take more torque. IS300 has less torque than FZJ80. I would prefer the one installed on a Lexus LS400/430
There are a few reasons I discounted the A750F for this project.
-It belongs to a different transmission family.
-More electronics than the A343F - A650E family
-Does not bolt up
-Gear ratios are not well suited for the 1FZ engine (first gear is too short and the 5th one is way too long, making the engine rev up too much in first gear and lugging in 5th)
-not sure about spline count
-Those who have already regeared will redline the engine in 1st gear consistently.
-It simply throws the engine-gearing balance off, more than the Toyota engineered this combo to work well
-the 1st to 2nd gear spread is too wide (1.47 vs 1.27-OEM) which brings us back to the problem we are currently facing when shifting from 1st to 2nd with our current setup... too wide, falls on it's face worse when towing. Now, as a counter argument, a ratio of 2.042 is much better as a second gear ratio than the A343's 1.53 ratio.
1.......2....... 3..... 4...... 5
3.52.. 2.042. 1.4.. 1.00.. 0.716
With larger size tires the overdrive would put the engine at much lower RPM, possibly causing unwanted downshifts and simply revving too low (outside of the Toyota design specs)
Final gear in 1st would be 14.47:1 vs 11.52:1 (OEM) this ratio will increase depending on the axle gear used 4.11 vs 4.88 vs 5.29
Fifth gear would be 2.94:1 vs 3.09:1 (OEM).... but with larger tires this final ratio would further decrease depending on the size of the tires.
If paired with 4.88 gears, the first gear ratio will be crazy low and keep the RPM in a very high range (17.18 final vs 11.52- A343 with 4.11). 5th gear ratio with 4.88 axle would get you 3.49 vs 3.09- A343 with 4.11, which will get the engine in a higher RPM range on the freeway- Yes the larger size tires will reduce that ratio to a degree.
A650E
-might bolt right up (will find out soon for sure)
-same ratio of mechanical and electrical components and configuration as the A343F
-gear ratio spread is a little better, closer to Toyota spec for the given engine parameters
-same spline count
-same size as A343F
-regearing would not be necessary or required
-maintains a closer to Toyota spec balance between the engine parameter and gearing
-beter gear ratio spread between 1st and 2nd (1.17 vs 1.27 - A343F vs 1.47 A750F)
-will rev up the engine in 1st gear as much as with a theoretical A750 swap
-same as 80 OEM overdrive ratio, which will get slightly better with larger size tires, but too low of a ratio as with A750F
1........ 2........ 3........ 4...... 5
3.357.. 2.180.. 1.424.. 1.00.. 0.753
I really think and hope the A650 would be the perfect solution to our quest in swapping in a 5 speed automatic transmission, in terms of ease of swap, relative cost, keeping it Toyota, improving the gear ratio and extracting a greater ratio of power out of the engine, not having a bad experience while towing during the 1st to 2nd gear shift, street driving capability and pleasure would be better as well over the current 4 speed, no need to regear the axles or the transfer case and keeping the bad transmission gear ratios, might even cancel the plans for some to add a supercharger or turbo, it will not interfere with smog checks.
LS400 trans will work? Windsor Pick and Pull north of SF shows 12 LS400s from '90 to '98. Looks like they list for $99?
400-2 Transmission Rwd (Auto) Car $99.99