No personal experience BUT from all I have researched and information I have found they are a bad idea. The plastic is designed to be the weak point and fail if something is off with the motor. They are cheaper and easier to change than an entire seat motor
I agree with the statement that they are cheaper to change than an entire seat motor, but they were absolutely not designed to be the weak point for easy replacement. The weak point of the system should be the actual motor fuse, plain and simple. That's literally what fuses are designed for, to protect motors and the systems they are connected to from overloading. They did plastic because it saves money. Same for the visor tension mechanism, it's got an overmolded plastic cam for the spring clamp to ride on because it saves money.
The evidence: the plastic gears don't fail until the cap falls out, and Toyota only sells the whole assembly and not the gear itself because they assumed the cap would never fall out despite not having a secondary retaining mechanism.
Ass-u-ming the parts were designed well, (and we all know what assuming does) they would be perfectly fine. The worms they mesh with are steel, and they would still be sacrificial to the steel in the event of a failure such as the cap falling out, but would stand up to abuse (running without the cap which ruins the geometry of the gear mesh) for far longer. They'd probably give a much more audible warning when that happens too.
The reality: someone else on here tried them and they were an interference fit on the shaft. They don't need to be (the stock ones slip on and off), which is no good in my book because it ruins future serviceability and self-alignment capability.
Edit: I suppose maybe the person who invested in making them first might've had an issue with the splines on the gear or the shaft stripping, so they made them a press on fit so it would not wear the splines at all. But I cannot see how that would happen first, and I expect we'd've seen it on here if it did happen.