- Thread starter
- #181
One thing I do and Toyota Tech training teaches. Is look for why a failure occurred. It's rare to have a defect in a 100 series part, but does happens. But when they happen, usually in first few year/50K miles. For you to have a ECM failure, is unusual.
Can you think of anything, that may have shorted the ECM?
Who can say? My truck doesn't ever want for anything, but it isn't babied at all either. I've floated it across rivers with water over the hood, slammed it on car-sized boulders, sheared various parts of suspension/running gear off of it, sunk it in GA clay to the point of having to remove interior to clean it, spun all 4 big tires at once with diffs locks, etc. She also lives outside because the garage is full of garage queens. It's well used, and has a habit just fixing issues on her own (sometimes).
Here's something that my Ms and I were discussing the other day: Earlier this year while prepping the truck for CRockies, there was a super annoying issue with the door locks after a rain or a wash (cuz I wash my jambs every time). Driving down the road, the locks would just flick back and forth, very fast, for a while. I replaced the PF door lock actuator motor and the issue has gone away. But, while in CO for CRockies, we noticed that 5th gear was not kicking in while in low-range on the trails. Wasn't a huge concern as we were only doing very low speeds, but it had slipped my mind until now. Driving to and from CO in high range, no issues at all. Totally fine.
So I'm wondering if A- the door locks were any kind of indication of something related and #2: would it be feasible that the trans issue (no 5th) would vary whether in high or low range? Could it all be coincidence?