lumbee1
Native American
I know "If your driving a Land Cruiser, you don't worry about fuel economy blah blah blah..." I've had my Cruiser for 4 1/2 years and love it. However I'm tired of the poor acceleration, power, cruising, and hunting for gears with 4.10's and 35's. I also live on the east coast near sea level so that helps. But on a trip out west last year, I was begging for better gearing. My only concern with 4.88's is that my somewhat good fuel economy will go down. This is not a daily driver but I pride myself on squeezing 268 miles out of a tank or driving to the beach and back on one fillup. I don't want to be the one guy that says "Hey, can we stop for gas, again..."
I've done some searching and the general rule of thumb is 4.10 for light wheeling and fuel economy, 4.88 for wheeling and restored power, and 4.56 why bother. On the other hand, I have found threads where replacing the 4.10's with 4.88's put the engine back into its optimal power band and fuel economy actually increased. Tall gears for cruising and fuel economy or optimal engine efficiency and fuel economy, so which is it?
BTW, when I calculate fuel economy I usually don't factor in the 10% differential that I get with the bigger tires. When I do it makes the numbers that much better.
15.71 mpg corrected for tire size across Arkansas and Oklahoma.
I've done some searching and the general rule of thumb is 4.10 for light wheeling and fuel economy, 4.88 for wheeling and restored power, and 4.56 why bother. On the other hand, I have found threads where replacing the 4.10's with 4.88's put the engine back into its optimal power band and fuel economy actually increased. Tall gears for cruising and fuel economy or optimal engine efficiency and fuel economy, so which is it?
BTW, when I calculate fuel economy I usually don't factor in the 10% differential that I get with the bigger tires. When I do it makes the numbers that much better.
15.71 mpg corrected for tire size across Arkansas and Oklahoma.