My $.02: if we go by the logic that the Lc300 is a “true” LC and is as durable as the LC200, there should be no reason the TTV6 isn’t durable, esp if it has to match the LC reputation for longevity. As such, the GX TTv6 should be just as good; it’s all (more or less) coming down the same Tahara line, right?
That's the idea I think. The TTv6 should pass all the same durability tests as the outgoing 5.7 - maybe more. I think the GX will be basically just a reskinned LC300, so I would expect the two to be nearly identical in durability and reliability because I think he'll share nearly all of the same parts in all the places that matter for durability and reliability.
If I had to pick one that will last the absolute longest without any repairs - it would be the 1GR LC300 or possibly the 2.7 version of the LC250. Those two engines are known commodities that nearly last forever with almost no common problems. I would opt for the turbo engines myself. I'll take the trade for more power.
It's a heavy dose of marketing and promotion. So, I also don't take it as gospel. I think it's factual about the testing. I don't know that it'll translate into the same level of reliability as past engines. You'll note that GM and Ford also make all the same claims. I remember the first Ford ecoboost where they were advertising that they designed it to last 150k miles as though that was a huge achievement. I think we'll all be very disappointed if the service life is only 150k miles from a Toyota.I want to believe all this with all my heart ... I do !
But part of me, nah... They don't care "that" much for us !
Thank you very much for sharing it !