Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Sounds like you need a new insurance company after this - one that you interview carefully about vehicle disposition after an accident.
Why not get the 60 you wanted to start with and install the 3 point belts in the rear? From what I've seen it's a pretty simple swap as long as it has the threaded mount already in place.
Because I don't think I'd feel safe in it is the short answer. The truck handled the accident ok, but with zero crumple zones it transfered alot of energy into the passengers. Going to therapy for my shoulder because of the intensity of the hit.
Now, getting a 60, caging it, putting 5 points in and towing it to go wheeling that's a different story.The Cruiser replacement I got is a 08 Yukon XL 4wd, about as far from a 60 series as you can get with a SUV, unless I went to a crossover like the outback. My brother lobbied for a GX470, my dad lobbied for a 100 series or Outback. My insurance rental has been a 2015 Suburban and I've enjoyed sailing this boat for the past month or so. Of course once you commit to towing a trail rig it opens up FJ40's, FJ55's, 1st gen 4 runners and even buggies as possible options. So who knows where I'll be in the spring. Maybe I'll settle back into an 80 series.
I gotcha. I don't dd my 60 and safety with the kids is a part of the reason why.
I don't quite get your hangup on the factory seat belts though; I get they're supposed to be one time use but otherwise it's quite a simple system and not really "tuned" to each particular vehicle.
Insurance company?I was involved in a front end collision 8 months ago when a civic decided to make a left hand turn directly in front of me. Although the other driver's fault, I went through my own insurance. They ended up paying more for the repair than I paid for my 60 two years ago. Totaling the car or replacing the seatbelt was never discussed.
Oh, and stayallert - the thought has crossed my mind of if I was in a Subaru with four wheel disks and abs would I have been able to stop in time and avoid the accident all together or how much less impact would it have been. Interesting tid bit - stock FJ62 brakes are powerful enough to lock up 33's at 50mph.
Other thoughts that have crossed my mind - even with a mild lift, had I hit her in the door she would have been in rough shape because of the height difference. Had I been in my LX450 with 5" lift and 37's the first thing to contact likely would have been my tire which would have spun me at best, possibly rolled me over, or at worst launched me. I think it's natural to wonder how it could have been different in different vehicles.
I have a relative who works for one of the Japanese auto companies. According to him, all safety equipment has an engineered life expectancy of 20 - 25 years. This includes air bags and seat belts. Per his companies rules, they dispose of ALL safety related spare parts in their stock when they reach the end of the engineered parts life...period!
He also said, they will not make replacement parts, in fact, most times, that can not make replacement parts due to liability of manufacturing a safety part which has been superseded by known better designs.
As for used parts, I work for insurance companies, and they are risk adverse to say the least. I would be very surprised if an insurance company would have anything to do with installing a 20+ year old used safety part such as a seat belt or airbag, parts with unknown storage and previous accident history in a vehicle. Talk about risk and liability!!!!!
As vehicles age, the safety systems are going to reach a point where they are no longer safe and new replacement parts will not and are not available. There is talk about this now in the insurance industry as a result of the Takata air bag problems.
If a vehicle has a known safety defect...or a aged out safety part, and a new replacement part is not available, will an insurance company insure that vehicle due to possible risk to the driver and passengers if an accident occurs? More risk and liability could/would mean they decline to cover or higher premiums.
Technology is a double edged sword. No one anticipated that all these "old" vehicles would still be on the road 25 - 40 years after these safety systems were introduced, and the chickens are coming home to roost.
Don't look to the vehicle manufacturers to help - why should they, they sell new cars, why take on the costs and liability?
Don't look for any help from the insurance companies, new cars are safer and they pay fewer and lower bodily injury claims in new cars vs old ones. Plus smart Spy programs like Progressives and Allstates new device - Now Your Insurance Company Wants To Spy On You In Your Car
Government... Ya right. They want all the old s*** off the roads. More sales tax and higher registration fee's, less smog and smart cars.
Sorry for the detour and I hope you sort this out and jet your 62 back on the road safely, but this is the future IMHO.
AS mentioned earlier - this is likely your only option to replace the seat belts - Buy Replacement Seatbelts, Seat Belts, Retractable Seat Belts, and Seatbelt Extenders @ SeatBeltsPlus.co
Ok, so last Saturday trucking down the road and a lady blows stop sign and causes a collision. Luckily everyone in Cruiser was belted in and just a little sore. Odd thing that happened though was my son's seat belt broke.
After stressing all week on how they would value the vehicle, they say they are going to pay to have it fixed not total it. Surprising cause they started the week saying it would be a total loss. I think they thought it would be worth $1500 like any other 1989 car.
So I tell the adjuster, I only see one problem with the apraisel - it shows ordering a new belt from the dealer and I know it is not available from the dealer. She says "the shop will have to search for one 'comparable' if the exact part is not available. They have resources they use to locate parts all over the country,..." - I'm thinking, well I have IH8MUD and Cruiser Dan so take your resources and..... but I digress. Finally she says she's not a mechanic and so she just let's shop and appraiser work out details. My final e-mail to her states I realize she is not a mechanic, and furthermore I wouldn't expect most mechanics to be aware of the unavailability of a part that was only offered on vehicles in the US for 1.5 years. I just wanted to give her fair warning before work begins on the truck that there is a potential issue of a part not being available and having no 'comparible' part avaialable.
Obviously I can go junkyard parts. But given that this is my second not at fault accident in 14 months I've determined Okies can't drive and it is not a matter of if I will be in another accident but when. This time my 7 and 9 year olds were in the car. And I was really happy I paid the exoberant premium 62's get over 60's to have the factory installed 3-point belts.
So finally to the question - If no factory seat belts are available and there are no comparible parts (I know there is nothing bolt in) then what? Are they forced to total it?
Why not get the 60 you wanted to start with and install the 3 point belts in the rear? From what I've seen it's a pretty simple swap as long as it has the threaded mount already in place.