coiled40gary
76 FJ40; TLCA#6227
Hummmm, some thoughts on weld versus bolt...
Sure bolts shear, but with the bolt going all the way through, you would have to shear a grade 8 bolt in two seperate locations with the same movement. The shaft is a very tight fit, and the u-joint interface there is desighed to support the rotational forces by a set screw. The chances of enough rotational force developing there to shear a grade 8 bolt twice, is that even possible? And the U-joint itself and all the rest of the steering components survive?
Well, taking a look at my sample of one...
Mine has been in place for 26 years. During which time, I've turned a tie rod into a U. I've worn the u-joints on that steering shaft out to the point where you could grab the shaft, and move it up and down almost a half an inch. I've even stripped a pitman arm off the steering box once (other factors and someone elses work was involved there, but it happened). It is my daily driver as well as my trail beater, and out of balance 10 ply 37s at highway speed is probably the worst case scenario, and there has been plenty of that over the last 26 years. There was one period in time when I was running recapped military hummvee tires on dual beadlock wheels with very heavy rock rings. With four pounds (yes I typed that correctly) of lead on each wheel attempting to balance that mess, it shook so bad, it actually broke a control arm on the rear axle.
I have had need to take the steering column apart at that point, aside from the original assembly, which is much easier if the assembly comes apart there, on at least three occasions over time. Once to replace the shaft with a whole new one, and twice when I pulled the tub off the frame. To this date, there is no wear on that bolt, or the holes that it passes through.
Permenent modifications on a vehicle that may last 50 years, needs to be taken with a grain of salt. My first steering column I put in, we (different group of people, being 26 years ago) all thought this was the permenent way to go. And in fact, it lasted about 15 years, which is more than permenent for most people who own and drive their vehicles for less than 10 years, and it lasted all the other vehicles involved beyond their ownership by the people involved (except for mine). The nature of modifications is that it is very possible that 20 years from now I may simply have a better idea, and want to do it differently. You may laugh, but today, I have found several occasions that I am very glad I concidered that 20 years ago.
Over time, I would be more concerned about a shaft that has been welded and ground on several times fracturing under load than I would a grade 8 bolt used in that application shearing. And the bolt condition is easily monitored and replaced on a time cycle if that is a concern.
The bottom line is that u-joints are servicable (replaceable) items, in my simple mind a better design is one that would allow me to easier removal of the servicable items for servicing or replacement.
Just my two cents, and my opinions change often in the light of better explanations
. Don't mean to step on toes.
gary
Sure bolts shear, but with the bolt going all the way through, you would have to shear a grade 8 bolt in two seperate locations with the same movement. The shaft is a very tight fit, and the u-joint interface there is desighed to support the rotational forces by a set screw. The chances of enough rotational force developing there to shear a grade 8 bolt twice, is that even possible? And the U-joint itself and all the rest of the steering components survive?
Well, taking a look at my sample of one...
Mine has been in place for 26 years. During which time, I've turned a tie rod into a U. I've worn the u-joints on that steering shaft out to the point where you could grab the shaft, and move it up and down almost a half an inch. I've even stripped a pitman arm off the steering box once (other factors and someone elses work was involved there, but it happened). It is my daily driver as well as my trail beater, and out of balance 10 ply 37s at highway speed is probably the worst case scenario, and there has been plenty of that over the last 26 years. There was one period in time when I was running recapped military hummvee tires on dual beadlock wheels with very heavy rock rings. With four pounds (yes I typed that correctly) of lead on each wheel attempting to balance that mess, it shook so bad, it actually broke a control arm on the rear axle.
I have had need to take the steering column apart at that point, aside from the original assembly, which is much easier if the assembly comes apart there, on at least three occasions over time. Once to replace the shaft with a whole new one, and twice when I pulled the tub off the frame. To this date, there is no wear on that bolt, or the holes that it passes through.
Permenent modifications on a vehicle that may last 50 years, needs to be taken with a grain of salt. My first steering column I put in, we (different group of people, being 26 years ago) all thought this was the permenent way to go. And in fact, it lasted about 15 years, which is more than permenent for most people who own and drive their vehicles for less than 10 years, and it lasted all the other vehicles involved beyond their ownership by the people involved (except for mine). The nature of modifications is that it is very possible that 20 years from now I may simply have a better idea, and want to do it differently. You may laugh, but today, I have found several occasions that I am very glad I concidered that 20 years ago.
Over time, I would be more concerned about a shaft that has been welded and ground on several times fracturing under load than I would a grade 8 bolt used in that application shearing. And the bolt condition is easily monitored and replaced on a time cycle if that is a concern.
The bottom line is that u-joints are servicable (replaceable) items, in my simple mind a better design is one that would allow me to easier removal of the servicable items for servicing or replacement.
Just my two cents, and my opinions change often in the light of better explanations

gary