landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #541
Not yet. They'll be thinner and stronger.... We'll see...
Builds Resto-mod on my 55 has begun (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter landcruisnman
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #542
Rear shocks mounted for mockup and clearance. Gonna mount fronts and take it off jacks..... For the first time!! Put body on and check for clearance....
Damn, that's really cool looking! Never seen anything like that. Good Job!
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #545
On its own weight.... It'll drop more with body
Cantilever suspensions are so badass.
How did you figure out what dimensions to build the cams to and what the spring rate of the coil overs should be?
How did you figure out what dimensions to build the cams to and what the spring rate of the coil overs should be?
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #547
My buddy knows all those formulas being a trophy truck builder. The spring rate we'll play it by ear once we get the weight on them....It's higher being cantilever...
Can you hurry him up a bit?
I need some shop time there!
Cantilever setups still befuddle me....but no more than a general knowledge of suspension, to qualify.
That said, the beauty of cantilever is all in the packaging (to me) and now we know that a balanced up and down wheel travel is attainable, contrary to popular belief that it's an all down, trophy truck suspension.
That's gorgeous!!
I have a question, if I may.
SHOULD prolly be posed elsewhere, many without the direct knowledge want to get in on, but think your buddy could answer in short order.
Your rear lowers are curved.
I'm assuming this is for clearance, as it is in most cases, but I have been curious to know how that effects the link tangent.
Lemme explain my question.
Typical links are straight and all calculations are based from point A to B in a straight line, the goal being the links remain as flat as possible (level) with the frame rails.
Does bending the link impact this?
Using yours, as an example, if they went from point A to B, there'd be a pitch to the link, but since it's curved for a percentage of the link length, it's flat within that same distance.
I've been trying to figure out for a long time, whether this somehow impacts calculator data, or if it should still be input as point A to point B, the curve having no bearing on link angle.
Hope that makes sense.
I need some shop time there!
Cantilever setups still befuddle me....but no more than a general knowledge of suspension, to qualify.
That said, the beauty of cantilever is all in the packaging (to me) and now we know that a balanced up and down wheel travel is attainable, contrary to popular belief that it's an all down, trophy truck suspension.
That's gorgeous!!
I have a question, if I may.
SHOULD prolly be posed elsewhere, many without the direct knowledge want to get in on, but think your buddy could answer in short order.
Your rear lowers are curved.
I'm assuming this is for clearance, as it is in most cases, but I have been curious to know how that effects the link tangent.
Lemme explain my question.
Typical links are straight and all calculations are based from point A to B in a straight line, the goal being the links remain as flat as possible (level) with the frame rails.
Does bending the link impact this?
Using yours, as an example, if they went from point A to B, there'd be a pitch to the link, but since it's curved for a percentage of the link length, it's flat within that same distance.
I've been trying to figure out for a long time, whether this somehow impacts calculator data, or if it should still be input as point A to point B, the curve having no bearing on link angle.
Hope that makes sense.
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #549
Bent rear lowers won't affect anything. Point A and B still work the same. Clearance was the motivator.
That makes sense, because the total travel of the coilover is going to be less due to the effect of the cam. Very cool!!
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #551
It's going to be tricky figuring out where to put the sway bars.....and I will need those for sure...very flexy..
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #552
Not much progress, but here's a final version of the cantilever arm for the rear
cruiserbrett
GOLD Star
Pat, looks good!
Starting to look like a Baja pre-runner. Can't wait to see the flex!
Starting to look like a Baja pre-runner. Can't wait to see the flex!
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #554
Got both arms welded up. Now finish rear of frame, steering finalized, put body back on to check for clearance of fuel cell.... It'll be funky shaped..
Whoa.
Very cool setup, what are your plans for a sway bar?
Back in the day I designed a similar setup for 1:8 scale RC cars and incorporated the sway bar links into the shock links similar to this.
Back in the day I designed a similar setup for 1:8 scale RC cars and incorporated the sway bar links into the shock links similar to this.
Last edited:
PabloCruise
SILVER Star
Very cool setup, what are your plans for a sway bar?
Back in the day I designed a similar setup for 1:8 scale RC cars and incorporated the sway bar links into the shock links similar to this.
That is a sweet looking design!
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #558
Pulling motor today and putting body on to kick up tank.... It's a new year. This is the year....
I dont know about anybody else, but pictures, pictures, pictures!
ooooooo! those welds!!!
ooooooo! those welds!!!
Last edited:
landcruisnman
1972 FJ55 "Iron Giant"
- Thread starter
- #560
Body is on and shocks clear... Tank mock up time
