Are those light bars?
Also, how would one mount a fridge slide on top of the battery in this arrangement?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
This is a drawing from Toyota's patent application for this layout about 7 years ago. Toyota knows. They chose to put it inside for some reason. I don't know what the reason would be though. It really screws up the cargo layout. The sequoia is probably the worst offender. IMO it would be less bad to stick it under the middle row like the tacoma/Tundra. At least in that case it's somewhere you're not using as often.It’s too bad the rear door opens upward and isn’t engineered to bear the weight of a spare tire. Some sort of factory swingout, barn doors, or tire mount would allow the battery pack to be mounted under the floor in a heavy duty enclosure also lowering the center of gravity.
If aux tanks are fine back under there, why wouldn’t a battery “tank” be fine back there? The battery in the rear floor is the biggest fail/compromise and reminds me of my gx460’s third row seats. I hated how much space they took up and removing them to install a platform or drawers looks so unfinished with how the trim is all designed.
In the patent drawing, it's still between the frame rails. Couldn't accomplish the same thing by getting it below the body, but still between the frame rails? Perhaps with a skid plate? Plus! You could buy an overpriced piece of sheet metal from one of our many vendors here to replace the cheapo Toyota peice.The point is to protect the battery when off-roading?
Which then takes up the space for the spare tire...I'm sure there are others that know more about this than I do, but doesn't the OEM aux tank sit above the factory undermounted spare? I think that was the case for 80, 100, and 200, depending on model, of course.
Which then takes up the space for the spare tire...
Not correct. The factory subs occupy the space above the spare tire.Are you sure the factory sub tanks don't sit above the factory spare in the empty space on our US cruisers? Or does that subtank force the underslung spare down lower? I thought it was the former.
You're right. I reviewed a handful of old BaT listings and if it's got a tire on the back the sub tank is equipped, but if not, there's not a switch on the dash for the sub tank and the spare is underneath.
Not correct. The factory subs occupy the space above the spare tire.
Aftermarket oversize subs require relocation of the underslung spare.
Doesn’t it also result in the spare tire being lower?Not correct. The factory subs occupy the space above the spare tire.
No.Doesn’t it also result in the spare tire being lower?
Ok, so you were saying my correction to come inline with M1911's opinion was incorrect and that my initial recollection was correct?
We are good and on the same page. You are supporting my initial claim (that I later doubted myself when I saw some examples and couldn't quickly find the parts diagrams) that the OEM subtank and underslung spare can coexist.I'm not clear what you are trying to convey.
What I am stating is that factory subs do not lower the location of the underslung spare tire mounting.