NLXTACY said:Well after looking over the shaft I realized the u-joints are used. I thought they were new u-joints. The listing wasn't specific but it did say "inspected". Guess I should have asked. No worries. I will get some new ones ordered up and replace all u-joints at one time. I will modify the first post so others know.
Anyone know off hand if the joints are the same for the Tacoma shaft front and the LC rear? If not, what year Tacoma shaft is used or better yet, part number for the joint?
I wouldn't worry about it, but Slee has the u joints for the ball and claw. Not for that specific application, since Toyota lists the drive shaft as expendable.
Rick wouldn't send junk, and they may have 100k left. For the money, can't beat it. $800 gets new joints all the way around, and $1,200 gets the holy grail of drive shafts which may be on the agenda for me, but for the money, the LandTank shaft is a winner.
Before spending a penny more on, I'd install the shaft and run it.
Douglas S said:You can't service the double cardan? You can on Jeeps and domestic vehicles, surely you also can on a Toyota?
Not according to Toyota. Only two companies in the entire industry have a replacement u joint, and if someone wants to prove me wrong on that, list them out, because I'm hunting a solution that a DC DS isn't capable of.
MJ80 said:The point of the IBP not functioning in 4" or less is interesting but i really cannot see that being an issue, i did consider it myself but after extensive discussion with the various builders and retailers we concluded that the IBP's function would not be inhibited regardless of shock length as long as your running it in a lift of proportionate size.
For clarification, my statement was based on conjecture, and prefaced as such.
Interested to hear your review.
Are you working with Autocraft?
Last edited: