I'm sure that would function just fine inside the Birfield joint. The manual specifies NLGI 2, but an NLGI 1 should be fine.
It has a lithium thickener, so that matches the Toyota requirements as well.
Synthetic greases are always superior in my opinion. Moly content looks good.
I agree that synthetics are superior than conventional, which is why I was considering to run Chevrons synthetic even though it was only a #1. Their #2 5% moly is only available in conventional. After looking at the technical data between Chevrons 5% synthetic and their 5% conventional, their conventional would appear to be more robust if not operating in extreme temperautre conditions.
Synthetic #1 shows to have 13% thickener with a ISO 220 weight oil used.
Conventional #2 shows to have the same amount of thickener, but the ISO weight of the oil is 330(which is where the extra thickness comes from)
As per Chevrons ratings:
ISO 100 for motors, high speed.
ISO 220 for most applications.
ISO 320 for higher loads, medium speed.
ISO 460+ for highested loads, slowest speeds.
Synthetic has a four ball weld point of 800+kg, and the convetional is 500kg.
Synthetic has a .48mm wear pattern while the conventional has a .43mm wear pattern. Now, I'm not sure if .48 was taken at 800kg and the .43 was taken at 500kg, but if it was, potentially if the synthetic was running 500kg on the four ball weld test, the wear pattern would be thinner.
Load index is 135kg for synthetic and 75kg for conventional.
The Timken OK load for the Synthetic is 40lbs while the conventional is 70lbs. Apparently for the birfield application, the Timken load would be a more important factor than the weld point.
The temp range for the synthetic is -40 to 450F, and the temp range for coventional is -15 to 350F. Dropping point on both is the same at 509F.
Flash point of the Synthetic is 450F and the flash point of the convetional is 525F.
Water washout for the Synthetic is highly superior at 1.5% oil loss compared to the conventionals 5% oil loss.
Comparing to Redline CV-2;
Four ball test, 400KG
ball wear, .46mm
Load wear index, 71
-100-500F temp range with a drop point of 900F.
Oil loss to water washout, 1%
Out of the three with the consideration of not running in weather extremes, would Chevrons conventional moly not be the better one?