Rivman1243
SILVER Star
That looks like a horrible place to mount an intercooler
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Interesting, I didn't know of any failures. But I sold my Evo about 4 years ago. Mine was an Evo 8 with no mivec and the Kelford 272's were great. Nice lope at idle. I think I picked up about 20whp from those cams? I was also running E85 + 25lbs of boost.I also own an Evo and after hearing and seeing all the failures with Kelfords MIVEC camshafts for EVO IX's, I am a little reluctant to use their products. However when I do the HG and freshen my top end, I'm going to look at these cams. No reviews but a relatively good rating and a 1000-5500 RPM range sounds pretty good to me.
Toyota 1FZ Camshafts
I think the cams would be an easy swap on with the head on. You will have them in and out a couple of times doing the shim thing but it's easy. The larger lift will help a bit with the tight shrouding to the cylinder wall. Not as much as canted valves but still helps.
The 4.6 helps with displacement but also unshrouding valves with a larger bore. Think 396 vs 454 (besides displacement)
I think the stock ecu is a throttle on the system too.
Too bad one can't mill the head for compression. Or at least I believe it's a no no
That's not really all that bad though. Big cam, port work, more compression, and better exhaust. Pretty much standard on every engine. I believe a better header may be a decent idea, though Mr T has done a pretty nice job on the factory cast iron manifolds. That said, my daughters NA cruiser with a header has more pull than my old stock NA cruiser had. A friend of mine that builds and restores muscle cars, as well as build cars and engines for the F.A.S.T. drag racing series (factory appearing stock tire) just dynoed their latest 426 hemi for their 71 Challenger with factory carb, dizzy, intake, and cast iron factory exhaust manifolds at 960hp. The manifolds are sitting in my shop right now (I high temp powder coated them) and they have a nice port job but still stock castings. Makes me think a little port work on the factory Cruiser manifolds would be a good idea as well.Well what everyone is calling 4.6L. Is actually something a little less than 4.566 and stock is 4.477. We are talking probably 85cc's of difference. And boring the cylinders from 100 to 101mm really isn't doing much for the shrouded valves as no one is going into the head and machining it to match the new bore.
If you watch @hazard s thread he has a good handle on what it will take to increase NA performance. It is going to be cams and higher compression pistons and some port work. There is no magic button.
I know CX stuff is US designed, China fabricated and all. I have a CX header on my SC Cruiser and it is doing very well. No issues like cracks or anything. It is very thick. I had to do some port clean up on it where the flange transitions to the pipe but fortunately their is so much meat there it can be done. Turnkey, the header is kinda lame. With a bit of work it came out nice. No clue on performance increase. She runs really well but no hard data.So if the turbo was a decent brand, what's the issue with CX racing?
Im happily in the process of a Robbie buildI got the Robbie special, but I don't know what the real difference is. I have no terms of comparison or dyno results. All I know is that I want more power.
I'm surprised nobody has posted about this yet.
Extreme Landcruiser Presents the 1FZ-FE Stroker Kit by Brian Crower - Extreme Landcruiser Toyota Performance Parts
1FZFE STROKER KITS by Brian Crower for Landcruiser 80 100 70 [BC0358] - $6,786.80 : Extreme Landcruiser, Upgrades for Extreme Offroad Performance
Not trying to High jack the thread, but has anyone offset ground the rod journals on a factory 4.5L crank to gain some stroke ? Or would it weaken the crank too much ? Or maybe rods with a smaller big end aren't available ? Just looking at those stroker kits and trying to jew one out.
Interesting, I didn't know of any failures. But I sold my Evo about 4 years ago. Mine was an Evo 8 with no mivec and the Kelford 272's were great. Nice lope at idle. I think I picked up about 20whp from those cams? I was also running E85 + 25lbs of boost.