Adding some wheel spacers, and searched and it seems some have used hubcentric, but the vast majority - at least by brand used, are non-hubcentric.
What's the issue pro-con?
What's the issue pro-con?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Hub Centric would be ideal, but you can not do them on a 80 due to the size of the hubs. Unless you make the spacer wider than the hub, you can not machine a lip on them to make them hub centric. The 80 is a different in the 93/94 are lug centric lug nuts, but still seat on the hub. 95-97 has hub centric style lugnuts.
Sounds about right. You can minimize the issues with fitting hubcentric wheels onto the lugcentric spacers by first centering the wheels using 3 conical lug nuts (try to get ones that are larger than the 19mm ones. Once you have the wheel centered, install 3 hub centric nuts and then take the 3 used to center it off and replace with hub centric ones. Works 99% ok.
...
That also leads me to believe that the hub isn't supporting the weight as some people seem to be afraid of when going to lug-centric wheels, cause if it was on these no 80 series vehicles, it doesn't seem reasonable that they would us that .25" centering protrusion for supporting the whole vehicle.
As for 99%, you get a little bit of vibration like a wheel that is out of balance when they are not centered (lug centric). That said, I have driven thousands of miles with lugcentric spacers that we installed like I mentioned with no issues.
No matter the hub size, the lugs will always get it centered. I also think (sorry Christo) that the late model shank (flat) nuts also center the rim. They are a really tight fit into the holes. When a 95-97 rim is put onto the hub it sits on the hub and is off center, but when the first nut, on 12 o'clock position is turned and the slight taper on the nut begins to touch the rim, then the whole wheel lifts a little bit. This feels like centering. Then when the 6 o'clock nut is inserted, a slight correction is made and the wheel is stiffened even further. So I really dare to assume that even the shank nuts have a centering function. I've installed spacers in a total of 3 95-97 crusiers and none of them has vibrations or any spacer-related problems.
You can be really calm about the whole hub/nut centric thing. I use the OEM LX450 wheels and lug centric spacers. They can be used on a hub centric vehicle because they have conical nuts. So the spacer can be way bigger in diameter than the hub and it will always be centered by the nuts. I haven't seen a spacer with flat nuts and flat holes. They all have conical nuts and tapered holes.
Have a look at this photo:
Below you can see that the holes are tapered. The nuts are also conical.
No matter the hub size, the lugs will always get it centered. I also think (sorry Christo) that the late model shank (flat) nuts also center the rim. They are a really tight fit into the holes. When a 95-97 rim is put onto the hub it sits on the hub and is off center, but when the first nut, on 12 o'clock position is turned and the slight taper on the nut begins to touch the rim, then the whole wheel lifts a little bit. This feels like centering. Then when the 6 o'clock nut is inserted, a slight correction is made and the wheel is stiffened even further. So I really dare to assume that even the shank nuts have a centering function. I've installed spacers in a total of 3 95-97 crusiers and none of them has vibrations or any spacer-related problems.
Which spacers are these? ( Who makes them ) And what is the width?
I have 1.5 inch spacers, was told they could not get any narrower, yours look like they are only about 1.00 inch.
Your pink panty machine is lug-centric, not hub-centeric.