However, a competent driver in an IFS truck can go where the 80 can. We have two club members with 100 series and I have wheeled a lot with the FJ team. And my daughter has a 4runner.
Now I am not saying the IFS is as capable as the 80 series. Put an average driver in an 80 and then a 100 and he/she will do much better with the 80 due to the solid front axle. Put a great driver in an IFS truck and they will do better than the 80.
It's like I went and bought the best Galloway driver with the 460 head. That is the most forgiving club and I can hit that better than any other driver. But a better golfer can take a cheap driver and outplay me because of his skill. The equipment can only take you so far and an excellent driver can compensate for poor equipment.
Ken,
I disagree with some of this. There are a lot of places I've been with my 80 that no 100 with IFS is going to make it no matter how good the driver is. I do agree that driver skill has a lot to do with how a vehicle gets down the trail. I realized this is true even more this summer when I wheeled with 3 other like equipped 80s in Colorado. The rigs were all set up similarly. It was amazing to watch how one rig would fly right through a section and then the next rig would get off track and get bound up. And then the next obstacle could be entirely different for each rig as the driver chose the lines. The golf club example almost works. The reason it doesn't work for this argument is there is a physical size difference between the two vehicles. Physical size does matter on some trails. I've been on trails so tight with my 80 that the clearcoat was peeling off, where would that put the 100? Crushed! This brings me to another point. It is a lot easier to accept damage to a vehicle that you have invested 16k into than a vehicle you have 25k into. And I'm talking total build cost. The dang 100s are expensive to build!
I recently went through the change from the 80 to 100. There are some things the 100 excels at there are places it where it doesn't. My driver skill did not change, but the amount experience I have with the IFS did greatly. I know I will be able to do more with the 100 once I get more experience with it. But I also realize it's limitations already. It is sort of like the guy with the 33" tires. He knows he can go so far, he knows he can go further with 35" tires. He sees the potential. Well, I know my driving isn't up to par for the 100 but I already see what the potential is of the vehicle. And the potential for the 100 tight trails that need a lot of articulation sucks.
Since some of you have brought up the FJ Cruiser I feel I need to comment on that too. The FJ Cruiser is very similar in size to an 80. The IFS on it behaves much differently than on a 100. It uses springs versus torsion bars. I think this is a better system off road from my observations. Granted I'm not a ME or a suspension designer or a professional off road racer, but from my observations it appears to perform better.
Hummer 1s/Hum Vees weren't designed for North American Off Road. They were designed to carry a load across the desert at speed. And they do a good job of that. H2s I can't say anything nice about them. They are an overweight Tahoe with very breakable parts. HA! Here is a spot where the 100 would shine off road. Towing out a broken h2. My old 80 was pretty tired dragging the H2 off the trail with broken diffs and transfer case. Now the H3 has some potential, much like the FJ Cruiser.
Anyway, really the debate could go on and on forever. And really you need to define off road better to know which is better. Off Road is way too vague. Does off road mean off pavement? Or does it mean on a trail? What type of trail? Or does it mean sand dunes? OR???