Tube/Hybrid Stretched 40 Frame and Suspension Design - Advice/Comments? (2 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

DirtSniffer

Professional dirt sniffer, rock licker
SILVER Star
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Threads
19
Messages
380
Location
Rockford, MN
In the beginning stages of building a stretched 40 and considered a few frame options and largely landed on building a frame from scratch. Not super interested in stretching an actual 40 frame, most are pretty rotted around here, and I would need some modifications to suit the front 3 link I am building it with and notch the rear for coilovers, among other things. Looked at the Aqualu stretched frames, they look nice and add some clearance for panhard/drag link in the front as it doesn't droop back down, but they are expensive because of shipping and not quite what I wanted. Looking for around 12-14" of frame and body stretch, and trying to keep it low-slung with ideally 5" of up-travel. So instead I have been working on designing a frame to build from scratch myself. I have never built something like this before and would greatly appreciate any advice or calling out any issues or areas that could use improvement with my design that any of you may see. I am in no way a professional, I am YouTube Certified in everything I do, so I am sure there will be some things.

I have a crude level of familiarity using CAD, and SketchUp is the software I am most comfortable with at the moment and it has been great for visualizing stuff and testing for engine fitment (Rig is getting a merc OM606). I also have bend-tech and will be using it more once I get the design more finalized before starting to build it. I managed to find an existing CAD model of a 40 frame online that seems pretty dang accurate when comparing measurements on frame schematics I found online, and have largely used it as a reference for designing my own frame.

Right now, I am liking the idea of using 2x4 1/4 wall rectangular tubing for the the middle horizontal portion where the frame end link mounts will all be welded to. Then, coming off each end with 1.75" DOM, either 3/16 or 1/4 wall. My JD2 M32 can apparently handle 1/4 DOM, I am leaning towards that for extra beef. Frame rails will each be straight all the way front to rear to simplify making them, but slightly angled apart towards the rear like most frames like the 40's, but a bit narrower at the rear to make more room for coilovers. The rear bumper is something I am already a good ways into building and will have an integrated witch mount and through-hole. How exactly I am reinforcing this area and cross bracing the frame, I have not decided yet. The front "stinger" will be integral to the frame, and will likely be welded up with a inner solid sleeve somewhere behind where the grill hoop ties in. Needs to be beefy, I plan to have some sort of clevis mount or other type recovery point near the front of the frame. The grill hoop may or may not be removable, have not decided. Tube fenders will tie into the front hoop and will be removable.

The other way I was considering doing this is similar to the Wide Open Designs Jeep Tube Frame and just making it all out of tube. I could probably pull it off, but I feel the square tube method will be easier for me to keep things square on.

So anyways, here is where I am currently at. I have not put a ton of effort into making it look clean as I know I will be starting fresh once I can take some real world measurements this spring. There's a few link brackets plopped on I was playing with, may be mounting the rear frame uppers above the frame rails as shown to get more separation. Goal is to have a flat belly, the split case will be clocked up to hopefully be close to flush with bottom of frame. Instead of having two sections of tube coming off the front, I currently have one that will be reinforced by a piece of 2x6 cut to fit. This will need some adjustment, I am hoping to have that 2x6 situated so that I can weld the drivers side motor mount to it. I also think I have it too far back and may hit the footwell, need to confirm some measurements this spring when I can dig stuff out. Front end should be getting more reinforcement as I hope to tie the front hoop into the roll cage and will have some sort of hoop for coilovers that can tie in as well. Sitting at about 22" of belly height (this includes about 1" of extra clearance shaved off the bottom vs the 40 frame) and looks to clear about 5" of up-travel with 37's. Panhard for the front will likely need to be bent like an 80 panhard to clear the radiator fan on the 606, but should have plenty of clearance from the frame for panhard and drag link. I may even drop the front down an inch or so. Planning on building axles using Ruff Stuff 9.5 housings, but may need to go to an 8" HP for the front depending on how much room I have.

15.PNG

16.PNG

17.PNG


Here are a few with the engine and axles in place. The nice thing about the slant OM606 and offset split case is I can shift the engine over like the 2F was and make more room for a top link on the diff side.

1.PNG

2.PNG

3.PNG

4.PNG

5.PNG



And a few with a bit of body on it... playing with fender height to get more up travel. may end up cutting into the hood.

12.PNG


13.PNG
 
Looks like a nice start. 3/16 should be fine with .120 wall dom for tube.
 
Looks like a nice start. 3/16 should be fine with .120 wall dom for tube.
I think you're right. That jeep tube chassis uses 3/16 tube for one main runner front to about the B pillar, rest is 1/8. I'm thinking maybe 3/16 2x4 and 3/16 tube for the front part and stinger that will probably get bashed and 1/8 for the rear. Thing is probably going to be a heavy pig either way.
 
This is going to be a good build. My factory frame was in pretty good shape so I went ahead and stretched it. My front frame rails limit my up travel to 4” with my center at 23” on 40” tires. The rear has 7” of up travel. Good luck!
 
This is going to be a good build. My factory frame was in pretty good shape so I went ahead and stretched it. My front frame rails limit my up travel to 4” with my center at 23” on 40” tires. The rear has 7” of up travel. Good luck!
Thanks! I feel bad not doing anything for so long on the build thread, but I recently dumped my distraction 80 so now this is my only money pit to focus on. Should have something to look at by end of this summer.
 
What drive train are you planning to run? Do you have any parts yet to look at?
Mercedes OM606 turbodiesel, 722.6 NAG1 from a jeep wrangler (same merc trans the 606 had but 4wd, bolts right up with a bellhousing swap, need to buy still) adapted to a 38mm split case with either 3:1 or 4:1 gears. Planning on building custom 9.5 axles using Ruff Stuff housings. My 40 body is hacked in half from where I last had it, will be stretching it behind the B pillar. Nothing pretty to look at yet, everything is pack ratted away for winter still. This is the latest pic I could find of the rear bumper, swingout spindle has since been welded on.

PXL_20240602_200625624.jpg
 
I resisted combining a couple of 40 frames I had for my stretched project because I was worried about the torque from the Cummins 6bt twisting something. They just seemed so tiny compared to the truck frames I'm used to.

I used a frame from an '89 super duty and actually shortened it 30 some inches to get to 132" WB.
The frame has a terrible belly in it, but when the tub is on it there is minimal clearance to the transmission/Tcase, and they sit right where they should in the frame. I've considered if I could have done better by just using straight frame rails and come to the conclusion that I couldn't, but the most updated version of CAD that I have still uses Cardboard.

My front links are attached to 1/2" plate running across the bottom from rail to rail. I originally used 2 x .250 links, but upgraded the lowers to 2.5 x .5 because of how heavy it is turning out.
 
I wouldn't widen the frame at the rear. That's the most pita thing I feel with trying to link a 40 in the rear. It makes packaging coilovers super difficult if you aren't going with pretty wide axles. If (read as when lol) I end up building another 40, I'm front and back halfing it to package things better, and fully integrating a cage, and gutting the floors and firewall. I would rather build around the suspension and drivetrain and get a better fitting body than trying to build around some rusty sheet metal.
 
I wouldn't widen the frame at the rear. That's the most pita thing I feel with trying to link a 40 in the rear. It makes packaging coilovers super difficult if you aren't going with pretty wide axles. If (read as when lol) I end up building another 40, I'm front and back halfing it to package things better, and fully integrating a cage, and gutting the floors and firewall. I would rather build around the suspension and drivetrain and get a better fitting body than trying to build around some rusty sheet metal.
Problem is frame needs to be narrow at the front for steering clearance, and wider about half way for transfer case clearance, and then I believe the rear is just made wide for stability with leaves. Not as important for linked, but rails do need to widen going back. Parallel rails would be easier but just too narrow to fit stuff imo. As you can see though from the stock frame comparison pics, I did narrow my frame at the rear to give me that clearance for coilovers. I'll likely be running roughly 63" wms. It will be getting a full cage tied into frame and I'll be building new floor pans, will be getting a rear bench seat.
 
Problem is frame needs to be narrow at the front for steering clearance, and wider about half way for transfer case clearance, and then I believe the rear is just made wide for stability with leaves. Not as important for linked, but rails do need to widen going back. Parallel rails would be easier but just too narrow to fit stuff imo. As you can see though from the stock frame comparison pics, I did narrow my frame at the rear to give me that clearance for coilovers. I'll likely be running roughly 63" wms. It will be getting a full cage tied into frame and I'll be building new floor pans, will be getting a rear bench seat.

I'll bet you will be notching that rear frame to clear coilovers with a 63" WMS. I'd go at least 4+" narrower on each side to give better clearance and some angle to the coilover. I ended up inboarding mine because I didn't fell like going through my body once it was painted. Looking back, I wish I took more body out.
 
I'll bet you will be notching that rear frame to clear coilovers with a 63" WMS. I'd go at least 4+" narrower on each side to give better clearance and some angle to the coilover. I ended up inboarding mine because I didn't fell like going through my body once it was painted. Looking back, I wish I took more body out.
Sounds good I'll narrow that up, I was thinking it wasn't quite enough.
 
Sounds good I'll narrow that up, I was thinking it wasn't quite enough.

Sounds good! Coilovers always seem to take more space than anticipated.
 
This is going to sound backwards but building the chassis before the suspension is building the house before the foundation. All the chassis is a is a big bracket to attach the engine and body to the suspension - if you are building from scratch then you have the oppurtunity to build your suspension without constraints. Design that first then design the chassis to connect the dots.
 
Last edited:
This is going to sound backwards but building the chassis before the suspensions is building the house before the foundation. All the chassis is a bracket to attach the engine and body to the suspension - if you are building from scratch then you have the oppurtunity to build your suspension without constraints. Design that first then design the chassis to connect the dots.

i agree. Would much rather package the frame around the suspension and drivetrain once I know where it's roughly going to be.
 
I will definitely be planning out link mount locations and running the link calculator a lot before even ordering any steel. But from the link planning I have done already and looking at other 40s with links, I think I should be able to get a pretty good setup. I do need to figure out exactly where and how I am building the cross member behind the transfer case to look at how the lower frame mounts will look. I'll have a complete engine and drivetrain setup to look at soon enough from *cough @fjdiesel 😉

I will say though, I'm not exactly trying to build a buggy here. I'm still trying to keep it pretty streetable, more of a moderate rock crawler I can drive cross country. This whole custom frame deal is mostly just a workaround to having to deal with issues I'd have with modifying a stock frame.
 
I will definitely be planning out link mount locations and running the link calculator a lot before even ordering any steel. But from the link planning I have done already and looking at other 40s with links, I think I should be able to get a pretty good setup. I do need to figure out exactly where and how I am building the cross member behind the transfer case to look at how the lower frame mounts will look. I'll have a complete engine and drivetrain setup to look at soon enough from *cough @fjdiesel 😉

I will say though, I'm not exactly trying to build a buggy here. I'm still trying to keep it pretty streetable, more of a moderate rock crawler I can drive cross country. This whole custom frame deal is mostly just a workaround to having to deal with issues I'd have with modifying a stock frame.

Here's what's floating around in mine.

Cross iso.PNG


Cross top.PNG
Frame cross Bottom.PNG
Cross iso.PNG


20230206_180936.jpg


20230318_142251.jpg
 
A lack of a plasma table or press brake (yet) that can bend thick steel will probably limit me to a simple tube cross member. Lol.

It helps for sure. go tell @sogncab to spend some more money lol. He's close to you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom