I am restarting this thread because I believe for the first part before we got into forced induction engines,
I knew what I was talking about and the thread contained very good info. Now i did some research on forced induction engines and found like most of you said I had the theory down but I just had it ass backwards. When it comes to performance again correct me I may still be wrong but this is the idea i picked up reading through all this info.
Generally speaking forced induction engines with lower compression and high boost will perform better than ones with higher compression and low boost. Also supercharger are not all negative when it comes to wear and tear on an engine. Certain applications can make an engine more efficient along with what raventai said like for example if i was constantly driving in situations where say I was revved up to 4000 the sc would allow me to drive through that same area while at maybe 2000 rpms. Thus saving gas and workload(Hypothetical numbers). At the same time a sc will still add extra wear and tear on the engine and drivetrain in other situations and consume more gas than it would normally take. Does this lead to a shorter lifespan than a naturally aspirated 1fz-fe? What are your guys' thoughts? Doug seemed to know alot about this head issue but I still am going to ask this original question. Is the trd supercharger on a stock 1fz-fe hard on the head? If so is it because it is aluminum on an iron block as opposed to an iron head on iron block or is it not really an issue once you've replaced the original headgasket? And by the way I was right about one thing: BMW's run very high compression
but that is because the are direct injected and don't use superchargers or turbochargers







Last edited: