I’m not sure if it tries to be “smart” enough to adjust per corner on the fly. Albeit, it was only about 30-40 min of drive time, in the time that I monitored all 4 damping settings and secondary spring valve settings, I never once saw the wheels on one axle have a different setting from each other. The front and rear change.. sometimes more damping in rear and less in front and sometimes the other way (generally more damping in front), but it was always the same across the axle.I didn't consider the system not needing to do much until asked, and yes this should reduce wear. Plus it is possible whatever is going on inside the step motors, force valves, and spool valves is inherently less prone to wear.
I also didn't consider chassis-mounted accelerometers being capable of giving feedback. Still I wonder how much these can tell about which corner needs to adjust damping to achieve desired ride quality, for instance.
If the wheel position sensors had a high enough sample rate they could give feedback too, but something tells me the AHC computer in a vehicle designed in the early 2000s won't have the processing power.
I would love to see those valves torn apart too.. was it @turbo8 that removed all of his stuff? I'd be more than willing to do a similar tear down on that stuff if it's available.
Also have to add, the monitoring system through the OBDII port I’m sure has nowhere near the fidelity that the ECU is making adjustments on. So I suppose it’s possible, it’s a flaw of the monitoring system and the truck is doing more than we know.