Heritage 2020
SILVER Star
I'm a biased proponent. My wife owned a Tesla S100D until last summer and it was a comfortable, reliable, and cost effective vehicle. If the CT can live up to that (after the bugs are worked out)--I'll be very interested.No secret I've been a proponent of the CT. My wife has had EVs for 10 years now and they have a strong foothold in my family. My wife is not a car person, but she will not go back to ICE and I can't blame her. I've been questioning if I feel the same way and it's hard to resist the merits of EVs, Tesla's specifically.
I'm a car enthusiast and love all things cars. I should say I could care less what other people think and I drive cars for myself. Beyond aesthetics, there's so much going for the CT that it's hard to resist. For context, I have both an LX and a 911 Turbo, both highly modified. Both vehicles may not have an assured place in my garage going forward depending on how the CT works out. I mean, when has there been in history, a single car that potentially has the bandwidth to supplant both hyperbolic cars in the way I use them.
As this is a 200-series forum, my baseline for comparison is my own LX on 35s that's a goat off-road and will tow, road-trip, or date night competently. It gets almost 500mile range unladen with the help of an aux tank. Will tow an 8k trailer about 240 miles. $150 per fill-up but it's all smiles for miles.
The Cyberbeast comes factory with what I've spent a lot of time to achieve in my LX. It has similar unladen range. Towing range will almost be similar. And it's doing this on factory AT 35s! I bet when fitted with lower profile HT tires, it would easily achieve 500mile range. On my friends Rivian, a swap from 32 HT tires to the factory 34 AT tires cost him 14% range. If we were to account for that same factor on the Cyberbeast, it would be 501mile range.
Yes the CT will be expensive. Interesting, both my LX and Porsche, when accounting for time adjusted purchase costs new, were each more than a full spec CT with extender.