What???
The English language got murdered and buried in a shallow grave, only reachable with 33" ATs, mad skills, and LSDs a few pages back, and now you say "what?".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
What???
can you say more about your Detroit locker experiences?All of these noted issues are why I put detroits in mine, front and back
and once you get used to them they are very predictable in their driveability and you can always depend on them to work
the issues of it being hard to steer is kind of a non issue as you can shift out of 4x if you need to
i realize this thread isnt about the viability of non selectable vs selectable lockers... but you can mitigate alot of said issues by going detroits
and in my mind its actually easier on things as you dont have the front diff trying to change the tires thats spinning when in 'open diff mode'
just a thought
How often are you backing up and going forward? I mean to be honest, I really cant think of a time when i would be just rocking back and forth like this. Sure you reverse/roll off an obstacle or take a new line but these are large movements when you are locked. Moreover, on difficult climbs or off camber crawling, your tries are slipping anyway sometimes while locked anyway so its not like you really lose anything having to wait for a small rotation.
The only time I can think that it might be annoying is if you roll back to give your self a bump but they re just going to lock back up when you move forward.
I wonder if some of this shortcoming can be addressed or mitigated with left foot braking. does that help build load and keep the diff locked or help the diff lock up before you reengage an obstacle?I think the scenario that people are leery of is being locked, driving forward, rocking back momentarily, then getting on the gas to go forward again, and having the mechanism unlock in that half tire rotation. So, when you got the gas again the kicker is momentarily unlocked.
I can picture it being a potential downside, but without playing with it in the bush, not sure if would actually translate to being a problem
It would tend to occur more when in mud or snow trying to move forward, then shift to reverse. There is that moment where everything is unloaded and in a "neutral" position. Then it ramps up the other side while inertia is building. Holding the brake will have no effect.I wonder if some of this shortcoming can be addressed or mitigated with left foot braking. does that help build load and keep the diff locked or help the diff lock up before you reengage an obstacle?
so apparently not. after it disengages, the reengagement doesn't always happen predictably or reliably.
there's video of people spinning one tire while locked. the engagement isn't happening.
I would have to see a video and I’ve already seen plenty as this would contradict the mechanical operation of the locker
I wonder if some of this shortcoming can be addressed or mitigated with left foot braking. does that help build load and keep the diff locked or help the diff lock up before you reengage an obstacle?
Actually, left foot braking would make it worse, because with the brakes on, you're inhibiting wheel rotation and it's the rotation that's necessary to engage the locker(s).It would tend to occur more when in mud or snow trying to move forward, then shift to reverse. There is that moment where everything is unloaded and in a "neutral" position. Then it ramps up the other side while inertia is building. Holding the brake will have no effect.
I hear you, but the videos show clearly that sometimes multiple full rotations of the wheel do not actually engage the locker. manufacturer language mentions load, so my query is of you need that half revolution of travel to be loaded for the locker engagement.Actually, left foot braking would make it worse, because with the brakes on, you're inhibiting wheel rotation and it's the rotation that's necessary to engage the locker(s).
After watching the video you posted in your post #231, I truely believe that there is an electrical issue with that rig's lockers. It's also possible that the wrong gear lube is being used. They are NOT that complicated. If the electromagnets are getting the voltage, there's no excuse for them not to engage, with proper rotation, unless there is excessive friction in the gear set. My Harrop manual indicated using 100% synthetic 75w-90. I use Amsoil and have not seen that kind of performance with mine. Also, if a wiring error causes intermittant opens at the locker, than it makes sense that it's performing like thatI hear you, but the videos show clearly that sometimes multiple full rotations of the wheel do not actually engage the locker. manufacturer language mentions load, so my query is of you need that half revolution of travel to be loaded for the locker engagement.
or is something else at play?
After watching the video you posted in your post #231, I truely believe that there is an electrical issue with that rigs lockers. It's also possible that the wrong gear lube is being used. They are NOT that complicated. If the electromagnets are getting the voltage, there's no excuse for them not to engage, with proper rotation, unless there is excessive friction in the gear set. My Harrop manual indicated using 100% synthetic 75w-90. I use Amsoil and have not seen that kind of performance with mine. Also, if a wiring error causes intermittant opens at the locker, than it make sense that it's performing like that
Hmmm I have seen that video and I guess never made that much attention. Thanks for sharing. That’s a bit curious. Wonder what the cause is, sounds like one of the dudes had them replaced twice already. As mentioned maybe it’s more of an electrical issue.
To be honest, the Harrop is not a locker that you'd use for competition or technical rock crawling. It's forte is simplicity and reliability. BUT, it must be installed, including the wiring or especially the wiring, with care away from heat sources like exhaust pipes, and allowed to flex safely between axle and frame/body. Lastly, use the best quality 100% synthetic gear oil and keep it maintained. Most have not experienced the difference between mid quality dino gear oil and the high quality 100% synthetic gear lube such as Amsoil Severe Gear. When I lived in Wyoming, I had to park my work truck outside in sometimes -20 F and colder at night. One morning, I started the truck and couldn't move the manual gear shift into neutral until it had warmed up after about 20 minutes. Had to sit there with the clutch depressed all that time. I switched to Amsoil 100% synthetic 75w-90 gear lube, in the transmission and never had that problem again. Just one example of the performance of true synthetic gear lube.I am glad to hear your experience because that's encouraging. again, there's a lot of satisfied customers. I am thinking of a Harrop for a front locker and sticking with factory Toyota in the rear.
to be honest I'm not trying to crawl up rocks and intentionally damage my rig to get the "win"
I just want to be able to get to camp, wherever it is. I only want to do this job once this decade if you get my meaning. I'm not loaded with money and just want to do the due diligence to get it right on the first time around.
I considered the comment on the 2 replacements, too. But like @trinydex mentioned, the author is clearly an ARB believer, so he could be lying or fed bad info from the Harrop rig owner. It could even be the installer is totally inept and keeps screwing up the installs.Hmmm I have seen that video and I guess never made that much attention. Thanks for sharing. That’s a bit curious. Wonder what the cause is, sounds like one of the dudes had them replaced twice already. As mentioned maybe it’s more of an electrical issue.