- Thread starter
- #381
seam sealer on that. thats the plan anyway. I seam sealed the back side while I had the brace not attached too. Thats what I did on the pans too.What are you doing to protect the backside of those patches?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
seam sealer on that. thats the plan anyway. I seam sealed the back side while I had the brace not attached too. Thats what I did on the pans too.What are you doing to protect the backside of those patches?
yep. I did see that. still I am happy with what I bought for the reasons I put above. Ill be sure to give my full thoughts when it comes in. Again if I feel like I need a 220 welder Ill pick up somthing later on.211 is dual voltage , just sayin.
Thanks man. Drank the blue koolaid I guess. I dont think I will have buyers remorse. It has a pretty good warranty at least if something does go wrong. I think as I am not ever welding anything thicker than welding a nut on a broken bolt. 99% of the time I am using it to butt weld body panels together. Thats what I bought the eastwood for originally. The most fabrication I will probibly do unless I start taking paid stuff is creating a boxed frame for to carry surfboards in the back of the Daihatsu fire truck of my Dads. (a planned father son project). My last reason to get the 142 is it was in my budget and I wanted to try the miller where with taxes the 211 really was not in budget, sure I could have stretched it a little but then I could not afford to do some other planned projects. sure I could have gotten a hobart 210mvp but its a bigger heavier machine and I do tote the welder out of the shed down to the carport to work so weight was a factor too.You made a good, well thought out decision based on "your" needs. I got by with a 110 volt Miller for many years. I thought about selling it when I got my bigger welders but, it's just too handy to get rid of. It's very portable and flux core isn't a problem in the wind. I still use it often.
I hope your new Miller is as trouble free as mine has been. Got it around 1986 or so.
I was just about to ask the whole 55 40 section on this. I need to by an accelerator pump. I think city racer has them. I dont have a air cleaner or cable linkage mod for this carb. and my holley is running fine right now. but part of me wants to set this up on my fj55.
That carb has a vacuum secondary which didn't start until '75
Could be a 1975 SOR list this carb going to 1/75-12/75 I believe if it goes with what @WarDamnEagle said. https://www.sor.com/cat/042dThat carb has a vacuum secondary which didn't start until '75
I might not even use this carb ever. Kinda want to put a new accelerator pump in it though.Yes, that tube was for the EGR. I just cut mine off and filled the hole with JB weld...It has a middle area above the base that had some smog stuff attached that I am wondering if it can be removed?
Could just read the date stamp...Could be a 1975 SOR list this carb going to 1/75-12/75
Thanks. Sometimes the parts diagrams are patently clear and sometimes not so much. Carburetors are one of those "not so much" categories. Looking at a later diagram, it looks like the number changed to -61022 in 11/75 so maybe sometime in '75? Like you suggested; read the date code.That carb has a vacuum secondary which didn't start until '75
Could just read the date stamp...
This is the first in a series of threads regarding how to identify production date of various Cruiser components.
Toyota (Aisan) carburetors from ~1963-present have a date code stamped on them.
It is stamped in small letters on the top front of the carb.
The format is Y M DD. Y is the last digit of the year (4=1964,1974,1984...), M is a letter of the alphabet corresponding sequentially to the month (A=jan, B=feb,...), and DD is the numeric day of the month.
Aisan throttle bodies on EFI vehicles have the same date code.
OEM fuel pumps also use the same date code.
Carbs...
- FJ40Jim
- Replies: 127
- Forum: 40- / 55-Series Tech
Hahaha I had no idea they had a date stamp on them... Ill check that out when I get home and report back.Thanks. Sometimes the parts diagrams are patently clear and sometimes not so much. Carburetors are one of those "not so much" categories. Looking at a later diagram, it looks like the number changed to -61022 in 11/75 so maybe sometime in '75? Like you suggested; read the date code.
View attachment 4066761