Pinion, cut n turn Q

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Ian since you are not SR you will not have a problem with the DS binding, it should be a none issue especially with that huge DS you are going to have, so it comes down to your decision: more clearance, or match joint angles. One is more work than the other :beer:
 
I've done at least 2 dozen FJ40 SOA conversion without cutting and turning the front axles. Done a few with a C&T too.

If you increase the front driveshaft legnth by abut 3 inches (or more of course) you do not need a cut and turn on an non-SR setup unless you are using some really tall lift springs in addition to your SOA.


Mark...
 
bustanutley said:
so it comes down to your decision: more clearance, or match joint angles. One is more work than the other :beer:

I reached the same conclusion, any thoughts which is the best way to go? Clearance is always good, but so is a nice DS.

What would 'nutley do? :D

Hey don't forget you have a whole stick or so of HREW here. You don't have to move it, its still stored with my tubing, just wanted to remind you.
 
Mark W said:
I've done at least 2 dozen FJ40 SOA conversion without cutting and turning the front axles. Done a few with a C&T too.

If you increase the front driveshaft legnth by abut 3 inches (or more of course) you do not need a cut and turn on an non-SR setup unless you are using some really tall lift springs in addition to your SOA.


Mark...


Thats great info. :cheers:
 
I would most likly be lazy and run it, but I will reinforce that you will not notice driveline vibs from the front and you can always run a cv. Yeah I know that stick is over there, I don't have plans for it yet, so it sits :) My cruiser should be moving again this weekend :grinpimp:
 
Mark W said:
If you increase the front driveshaft legnth by abut 3 inches (or more of course) you do not need a cut and turn on an non-SR setup unless you are using some really tall lift springs in addition to your SOA...

15º is the max angle for simple u-joint in DS .. ?

Toy CV comes in 35ª and 45ª .. O I thought if you are in 15ª - 20ª range why not .. I keep for years my single u-joint setup in my front DS with SR and 2.5" OMES maybe it means 4" of lift ..

But I thought with SO you must gain with flat springs 6" at least .. or not ..
 
Tapage said:
15º is the max angle for simple u-joint in DS .. ?

Toy CV comes in 35ª and 45ª .. .

mini truck single joint is 42°
Toy CV's, either early minitruck, or IFS clearanced, are 30°
 
Eskimo said:
mini truck single joint is 42°
Toy CV's, either early minitruck, or IFS clearanced, are 30°

you mean .. more angle with single joint than a CV join . ? like this one ..

CV.JPG
 
Yep, generally a single ujoint will give you more deflection than a double carden.


Mark...
 
single joint rear mini on the front of my SOA 60.....no c&t :D

sorry i did'nt have what you were after last night ian
at least we got the chunk of steel notch'd :D

meyebad ;)
 
Mark W said:
Yep, generally a single ujoint will give you more deflection than a double carden.


Mark...

first notice .. I always thinking in double cardan for more angle ..
 
2badfjs said:
single joint rear mini on the front of my SOA 60.....no c&t :D

sorry i did'nt have what you were after last night ian
at least we got the chunk of steel notch'd :D

meyebad ;)

No worries, appreciate the offer. It was good to see the notcher in action as I am thinking of buying one, and the notch you did for me means I am ready to start building the anti wrap bar. Thanks :cheers:
 
Trollhole said:
Is this with the castor set at +4 degrees on the front to allow for better turning with bigger tires?

Yes.

I think I am going to run it without a c&t. I am not trying to avoid a c&t, I have spared no expense or effort on this build trying to make it right. Its becuase of the trade off.

Clearance is always good, thats why I am doing the SOA in the first place. However, if I rotate the pinion up to increase clearance I am actually setting the pinion at the wrong angle in relation to the t-case. Yes I could use a double cardan, but from a purely mechanical point of view my pinion angle is (right now) correct, my caster is +4 degrees so its correct, and I can use a u-joint drive shaft just like the original (only longer and with more travel). With Mark W pointing out that he has done a similar arangement I feel confident, he's forgotten more about cruisers than I'll ever know.

I have not tacked the front perches yet, I am waiting till I finish the rear axle to allow myslf as much time as possible to see if there is anything I have not thought of yet.
 
Tapage said:
You gonna keep paralel lines in t-case front output flange and front pinion flange ... I thought.

Yes, exactly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom