TheGrrrrr
GOLD Star
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Shiny!View attachment 3250204
Finally got this knocked out. Thanks to @Cruiserhiggs for getting me on the schedule.
Depending on the push it can misalign the axle a bit, as much as the suspension allows. The panhard does not attach to the middle of the axle, therefore any pushing or pulling will create some misalignment
Yes. Just a byproduct of the transverse mounting locations. And the fact they are no longer in plane with axle front - rear articulation during stroke swing.
Thanks you just summed up what I was trying to say. Unless the panhard bracket changes the direction the wheels point (I don’t think so) I don’t understand why shifting the axle and thus both wheels left or right would affect the thrust angle. All wheels are pointing forward, they’re just offset.
YesI think you would agree that the panhard, through its travel, can displace the axle side to side.
Ok I kinda follow this explanation. Seems like it's not specifically because the "sides" (arms) aren't parallel (since a trapezoid is mirrored), but really because they are rigid so the lack of them mirroring each other and the fact that their length doesn't change means an arm which is "less square/perpendicular" will seem to pull that axle side towards the front of the vehicle. I need to build that with an erector set to confirm I understand what I just saidThe next key thing to understand is that the trailing arms are not parallel, nor square to the rear axle on the horizontal plane. They triangulate inward at the frame.
A way to imagine this is a trapezoid. Imagine the parallel sides to be the axle squared up to the chassis (0 thrust angle) Now imagine the shape pivots on the corners. The parallel sides will no longer be parallel on account of the diagonal sides (some thrust angle).
Yes
Ok I kinda follow this explanation. Seems like it's not specifically because the "sides" (arms) aren't parallel (since a trapezoid is mirrored), but really because they are rigid so the lack of them mirroring each other and the fact that their length doesn't change means an arm which is "less square/perpendicular" will seem to pull that axle side towards the front of the vehicle. I need to build that with an erector set to confirm I understand what I just saidbut I saw thrust angle measurements change on the alignment printouts earlier in this thread so I'll just accept it as fact at this point.
and declare it handles great. Well... no it does not.
Also basically the most subjective thing imaginable.
I’m just saying, there is a vast difference in what various people consider great handling, whether it’s actually great or not.Yeah, no. Different facets for sure. But if fundamental geometry is bad, no amount of quality damping will make for a good handing car.
Trim packer is the answerMy rear passenger side still has the KDSS lean no matter how many times I try the valve reset truck that Sargent recommended. Super annoying, might have to go with a trim packer back there. My only dislike for the system, wish it didn’t do that.
Trim packer is the answer
I don't think this is a KDSS lean. Unless you did a suspension install without cracking the valves, or unless the valves are internally frozen, the KDSS system neutralizes when you open the valves and the truck is on the ground. I've done a few spring swaps in the rear and I think it has to do with spring rate and length. The left and right sides of the truck in the rear are not identical weights, and the passenger's side spring is longer. You either need more weight on the high side or a trim packer on the low side.
Really? Taller OME spring always goes on the passenger's side. If you have more than 1" of lean you might just swap the springs left-to-right in the rear. When I installed my Tough Dog rear springs they were swapped and I had 1.5" of extra height on the driver's side. After swapping them and putting the longer spring on the passenger's side I was within 0.5". When I installed upgraded springs last year I put the taller spring on the passenger's side by default. I still had 3/8" of lean... technically within spec but adding a 10mm trim packer got me within 1/8" level when unloaded.Yea, I know ARB/OME said there weren’t any specific sides to the rear springs because I called and asked prior to install. Looks like the trim packer from Dobinsons is needed. At least it’s a cheap and easy install.
I’m just saying, there is a vast difference in what various people consider great handling, whether it’s actually great or not.
Really? Taller OME spring always goes on the passenger's side. If you have more than 1" of lean you might just swap the springs left-to-right in the rear. When I installed my Tough Dog rear springs they were swapped and I had 1.5" of extra height on the driver's side. After swapping them and putting the longer spring on the passenger's side I was within 0.5". When I installed upgraded springs last year I put the taller spring on the passenger's side by default. I still had 3/8" of lean... technically within spec but adding a 10mm trim packer got me within 1/8" level when unloaded.
Adding the 10mm OME trim packer/spacer will do the trick. Which side is lower for you? The driver side rear spring is super easy to access. The passenger side takes a little but more effort with disconnecting the kdss sway bar.While 1/2” is within spec I still want it level back there. No drawers, no swing outs, no fridge or LRA. This is completely stock in terms of weight and it’s noticeable even at 1/2” lean to the passenger side.
I talked on the phone with ARB/OME tech support prior to install and they said no discernible difference on the rear springs from one side to the other and I checked lengths and for markings as well.