Gertrude - 2F high performance rebuild (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

And solid lifters..
 
so is an opne chamber or a closed chamber better??


Also, andrew and Mark, what is the best cam you have found for the hipo 2F's...

I can power through the clutch in my cruiser (it is very new) and I don't want to have that problem in the 60..
 
mace i dont think open or closed is really better than the other for what we're doing. its really all in the volume of the chamber. closed runs a flat top piston where open runs a crown. same kinds of compression are obtained either way and if the system is designed properly, velocity and feed are fine either way. nothin wrong with open cylinders, 650 HP has been built with open.



cams?? what do you want?? torque or HP?? i think downey may have the better over the counter cams out there. but i havent really dived into everything.


also, mark and andrew i'm interested if you have messed with or given thought to lump ports?? i have been looking at my head while i'm shaping and porting, the bottom of the runners are a little flat and i wonder if small lumps would make a big difference?
 
Last edited:
sorry, not cam. I meant clutch.. Don't know HTF I managed to put cam in there.

I'll have to check out the spare 2F's that I have running around (78 and 86 or so)
One has a head that was recently went through. I bet I could have a bit of fun with that :)
 
Mace said:
sorry, not cam. I meant clutch.. Don't know HTF I managed to put cam in there.

I just went to my brake and clutch guy and told him I wanted one that would take a 4000rpm dump (repeatedly).

I've always had my clutch linings bonded as well as rivited since elary days racing when I shredded a couple.

You could always get a twinplate made up if you are having bad problems.

Not sure what the clamp on my p/plate is but I'd say it's about double a std one (from the muscles on my left thigh :) )
 
RHINO said:
mace i dont think open or closed is really better than the other for what we're doing. its really all in the volume of the chamber. closed runs a flat top piston where open runs a crown. same kinds of compression are obtained either way and if the system is designed properly, velocity and feed are fine either way. nothin wrong with open cylinders, 650 HP has been built with open.

For LPG, closed is a better shape (due to burn speed).

The open/dome option is easier to get more compression from with a 2F block/F head combo

I was aiming for 11:1 but just couldn't get there with the closed chamber. But here in NZ we never got the open/dome option so I had to used closed.
 
RHINO said:
also, mark and andrew i'm interested if you have messed with or given thought to lump ports?? i have been looking at my head while i'm shaping and porting, the bottom of the runners are a little flat and i wonder if small lumps would make a big difference?

Don't know sorry - I have a nice man who does that stuff for me so I don't have to worry too much about the details :)
 
has it been dyno'ed?
 
bad_religion_au said:
has it been dyno'ed?

Yes but only for tuning (dyno not accurately calibrated) so didn't note the result.

I did notice from the 1.5F with cam, headers (dyno'd) to this build (dyno'd) I had to open up the main mixing valve for the LPG by about 5 turns, and got approx 40% more power as a result.

I keep meaning to get it done - may have to soon, I'm lloking to install a fully programmable ignition controller...
 
andrewfarmer said:
For LPG, closed is a better shape (due to burn speed).

The open/dome option is easier to get more compression from with a 2F block/F head combo

I was aiming for 11:1 but just couldn't get there with the closed chamber. But here in NZ we never got the open/dome option so I had to used closed.


i forget your running LPG, it would really be nice to get that compression up a little more, you can have material added to the combustion chamber for this, but you dont want to reduce to much less that about 67cc's.
 
RHINO said:
i forget your running LPG, it would really be nice to get that compression up a little more, you can have material added to the combustion chamber for this, but you dont want to reduce to much less that about 67cc's.

With the closed chamber, and to get flow, I've already had to remove some material. Don't want to start adding it!

Maybe I need a turbo...
 
im building up a 2f in the near future, and i was just wonder about raising the compression to about 9 to 1 and running a better cam, is there a way to find out how much i need to mill off the block and head to get a 9 to 1 or should i just go with the specs you used?

is there anything else i should do if i mill the block and head down?

what are some of the draw backs from doing so?
 
RUSH55 said:
On your summary sheet it says you have a modified cam. Can you elaborate?Also, where are you running your timing?

cam 212 duration, .44 lift at valves.
I just went to my cam shop and told them what I wanted the motor to do and they did a custom grind for me.

Timing is currently set to 15 degrees at 500rpm
 
FJ40onNOS said:
im building up a 2f in the near future, and i was just wonder about raising the compression to about 9 to 1 and running a better cam, is there a way to find out how much i need to mill off the block and head to get a 9 to 1 or should i just go with the specs you used?

is there anything else i should do if i mill the block and head down?

what are some of the draw backs from doing so?

Depends on what you've got - flat psitons or domed?
An 'F' head will raise compression some with no other work (but match piston type).
Apart from that, you need to check what may have already been taken off.
Best way is to get your machine shop to cc the combustion chamber and work from there.

If your otal shave is too much you'll need to shorten the locating dowels or the head wont bolt down prorperly.

Pros = more power
Cons = higer octane petrol
 
andrewfarmer said:
Depends on what you've got - flat psitons or domed?
An 'F' head will raise compression some with no other work (but match piston type).
Apart from that, you need to check what may have already been taken off.
Best way is to get your machine shop to cc the combustion chamber and work from there.

If your otal shave is too much you'll need to shorten the locating dowels or the head wont bolt down prorperly.

Pros = more power
Cons = higer octane petrol

Best way is to get your machine shop to "cc" the combustion chamber and work from there.

"cc", what you mean by cc
 
RUSH55 said:
Cubic centimeters. That's how they measure the liquid used in the head blueprinting process. Am I right?


ok ill get on the phones after thanksday
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom