- Thread starter
- #21
I thought about this exact thing... but if you see the stop pin, it plays absolutely no role in keeping the seat from moving forward. I believe that it was put in to keep the seat from going too far back, possibly because if a seat is too far back the seat belts will not work properly. In my humble opinion, that makes a lot more sense design-wise.I'm sure it's not designed to recline more in the USA due to what could happen in an accident. We have different safety requirements & 'criteria' to get better crash ratings. Personally, I don't think it'll make much of a difference w/a child in it but a 300lb. man, in an impact, can apply some amazing forces where the teeth on the hinge wouldn't hold but that metal pin can. Just my $.02. I want to do this to my 2nd row ( I don't own a 3rd row) so hopefully it works there too!!!
I agree that the US probably has some "Nanny clause" regulations that state that the rear seats shouldn't recline more than X degrees, and I am guessing that Toyota engineered the stop pin to have a simple solution to the regulation. The way I see it, at the angle that my child is sitting at in the back, there is absolutely zero effect on her safety with the new additional recline ability. In fact, I think it is SAFER, as she is now going to sit properly back there, not all scrunched up sideways....
So, in summary I think that the stop pin is there to keep the seat from reclining, likely due to some regulatory requirement, but that doing this mod will make the children more comfortable and contribute to greater safety, so long as they don't recline it too much, which as a parent I can control...
All the best,
Muddy1

) you WILL break a seat backwards that isn't built correctly. Moot point. Great discovery & I thank you for it!!!! 
