- Thread starter
- #41
Panhard v1
I looked at a ton of different peoples panhards builds and this is what seemd to work in my head and was within my skill level. A couple of people have move the panhard n front of the passenger spring in order to get some extra length and that set up seems to work great. I didn't do a panhard mount like that because it makes the axle side panhard mount into a big lever that torques around one central point. They can pull that style of mount off because they're good fabricators and I'm just some dude in a very cold garage in Montana. So I looked at @Wermz 's set up, showed @arcworxs (he said it would work) and that what I did.
Like I mentioned before, the rules of thumb are great but in a real world scenario, you'll only be able to utilize one or two of them.... this is a great example. We could make the panhard and drag link parallel to each other and thats about it.
Lets go through the rule of thumbs that we didnt follow and what happens because of this
Now that the theories done. I really made a weird panhard....
I wanted 5/8" bolts so I went with a 2 5/8" joint from barnes 4wd... I since learned that johnny joints make a 2" version and its going to be what I go with next time because this giant joint sucked to package. uuuuhhhhh I did a 1.75"x 1/8" tube that sucked to package and put a silly bend in it. This was a very overkill panhard and I think it only measured like 29" long???? It was a little shorty boi, but it worked extremely well.
My biggest gripe with this set up is that it kinda sucks with a low ride height. I ended up adding in a 1" spacer to my spring so I had a total of 3" of lift. This made it so that there was a 4" span between the axle side panhard joint and the frame before it went metal on metal. The dent in my frame says that it went metal on metal alot because I probally didnt space the timbrens down enough. If you have super tight clearances and you want to smash into bumps... dont use timbrens... get air bumps its..... alot easier to tell when those will reach full bump.
I give this set up aaaaaa 6/10. Mostly because the joint crashing into the frame made a really scary sound.
I looked at a ton of different peoples panhards builds and this is what seemd to work in my head and was within my skill level. A couple of people have move the panhard n front of the passenger spring in order to get some extra length and that set up seems to work great. I didn't do a panhard mount like that because it makes the axle side panhard mount into a big lever that torques around one central point. They can pull that style of mount off because they're good fabricators and I'm just some dude in a very cold garage in Montana. So I looked at @Wermz 's set up, showed @arcworxs (he said it would work) and that what I did.
Like I mentioned before, the rules of thumb are great but in a real world scenario, you'll only be able to utilize one or two of them.... this is a great example. We could make the panhard and drag link parallel to each other and thats about it.
Lets go through the rule of thumbs that we didnt follow and what happens because of this
- Making the drag link and panhard the same length wasnt going to happen ...... the compromise is that unequal length will cause the arc of the short panhard to drop out of parralel of the arc of the arc of the long drag link. You can use solid works to see how bad the discrepancy on the x axis will be like I showed above. In this scenario, it's totally fine. ***The reason is explained bellow in #3***
- Make the drag link and panhard as flat as possible..... I was very worried about maintaining uptravel without notching the frame. Since the mounting location of the drag link is the constraint we have to work around the placement of that comes first. I chose to put the tie rod on the bottom of the steering arm. Because the mounting location of the drag link on the axle is lower, the drag link is at a steeper angle. If the drag link is at a steeper angle, then the panhard has to be at a steeper angle.
- We could make the drag link and the panhard parralel to eachother..... @arcworx showed me a bunch of examples in solid works. He compared set ups that prioritized keeping the panhard and drag link the same length and then showed me examples of set ups that prioritized making the panhard and drag link as parallel as possible. In every scenario, the set up that prioritized keeping them parralel would have a smaller discrepancy on the x axis over 5" of travel on the z axis. Thus I believe that if you have to compromise between keeping them parrallel or keeping them at at equal length. Keeping them parallel is the better choice!!!!!!!
- Make the distance from the axle side mount for the panhard AND the mount on the steering arm the same distance from the frame side mount for the panhard and the tie rod hole on the pitman arm was absolutely never going to happen.....
Now that the theories done. I really made a weird panhard....
I wanted 5/8" bolts so I went with a 2 5/8" joint from barnes 4wd... I since learned that johnny joints make a 2" version and its going to be what I go with next time because this giant joint sucked to package. uuuuhhhhh I did a 1.75"x 1/8" tube that sucked to package and put a silly bend in it. This was a very overkill panhard and I think it only measured like 29" long???? It was a little shorty boi, but it worked extremely well.
My biggest gripe with this set up is that it kinda sucks with a low ride height. I ended up adding in a 1" spacer to my spring so I had a total of 3" of lift. This made it so that there was a 4" span between the axle side panhard joint and the frame before it went metal on metal. The dent in my frame says that it went metal on metal alot because I probally didnt space the timbrens down enough. If you have super tight clearances and you want to smash into bumps... dont use timbrens... get air bumps its..... alot easier to tell when those will reach full bump.
I give this set up aaaaaa 6/10. Mostly because the joint crashing into the frame made a really scary sound.