Dang all these soccer moms are really gonna miss running their special forces black ops from their suburban driveways.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Dang all these soccer moms are really gonna miss running their special forces black ops from their suburban driveways.
That's it?@Blackford Oakes That's written in a Hulk Hogan voice, right?
And what exactly is wrong with having exclusive products which you want to attain in your life?
Many people work hard for their money to buy products that bring them joy, pride, and true gratification. It’s not a class thing, it’s the option of buying only the best engineered products that are designed to last for ~25 years, all while being able to fit in and not look flashy and ostentatious.
Let’s get real here. This battery tech is not built to last 25 years lol. There’s a reason why only the States are getting this powertrain.
I’m sorry, I should redact my previous statement about the Land Cruiser being a stealth wealth rig. The more I think about it, the more I despise that term because it’s not that to me. (It’s just what I have always heard)
I do not care about the luxury “bloat”. That’s not what the 200 series is about. Take a look underneath one of those rigs and you that will tell you everything you need to know about how that car was designed and developed. Stout with practically no compromise and made with Toyota’s pinnacle engineering standards. I simply want the best overbuilt tech from Toyota with or without the luxury bloat (that doesn’t matter) which money can buy.
The pics that have been posted in earlier threads show that the LC Lite has 4Runner sized components and not previous Land Cruiser sized components.
The previous land cruisers beef and heft in the components made it something really special.
Recently I watch a video from a very reputable mechanic many here have seen.What specifically in the Tundra was not 200-series quality? Same engine, trans, front diff, and a bigger rear diff in the Tundra. I think the Tundra had bigger brakes as well....many have gone to 1,000,000 miles of hauling.
I guess I'm not fundamentally buying the "LC is built better" argument when the non-LC vehicles perform so well. Either way, Toyota is not bringing down the LC but brining up the lower-cost models - increases in strength/capability of the 250/Prado relative to the 150 and lowering the gap between the 300 to the point where it's nominal. I see that as a good thing, not a bad thing, and personally don't care if they call it a Land Cruiser or a Land Cruiser Prado. It's just a name.
I was looking at a LX 570As a backwards comparison (which I may have mentioned before), I camped next to a guy with a moderately-modded 100 a few weeks ago (35s, F&R bumpers, nothing else). He said he was getting 12 mpg in his 100 just driving 500 miles of highway to get to the campground; I had got 13 mpg out of my GX470 towing our family for four and a 3,200# camper to the same place. It was the first time I looked at the "real Land Cruiser" as more of a downgrade to a GX/Prado/120 for my uses, and really realized the benefits of a smaller and lighter platform. This past weekend I stuck to slower backroads and got a whopping 14.1 mpg with our camper.
I like the 100 and 200, but the abysmal fuel economy is a pretty huge detraction. The comparison above is not apples to apples, however my total rig and camper weight was probably on the order of 8-9,000#, I doubt the 100 weighted more than 6,000#. Better fuel economy is a huge benefit in a lot of ways, and the 100 and 200 both really missed the mark in those regards.
I'm not so sure it's "convenient" as a marketing choice. To the vast majority of US Toyota buyers the name "Prado" has no meaning.But "Prado" is not a recognized name in the US, so they conveniently omitted that.
I get the same for my 80. The design of the third gen 4Runner borrows heavily from the 80.Few people even know what my GX is - one guy mistook it for a 4Runner.
The mechanicals are exactly the same, the body is completely different, and they share no exterior panels. The interiors are close but also different (totally different dash etc). They are much more different than a LX470 vs. 100 or something like an Escalade vs. a Tahoe, which both share most of the body panels other than the front clip and some badging. The GX460 is even more different with a different engine and transmission.I'm not so sure it's "convenient" as a marketing choice. To the vast majority of US Toyota buyers the name "Prado" has no meaning.
I get the same for my 80. The design of the third gen 4Runner borrows heavily from the 80.
Truth be told. The GX is basically the Lexus version of a 4Runner. The GX, 4Runner and FJ Cruiser all were heavily based on the Prado platform. Acting like the GX vs 4R are significantly different vehicles is just revisionist history.
I think the LC250 is very close to what a base model LC300 is. As soon as they start showing up I hope you or someone like you with the ability to drive both can give us a real review of how they compare. I don't think comparing to a LX600 is really a good comparison. I sound like a broken record, but I really don't understand why not just build an LC300 with the turbo4 hybrid and sell it in the USA. Once they shared the same wheelbase and running gear, why have both?I'll say this though and don't be surprised, if you had an LC 100/200 before and get a 250, don't be surprised if some things feel flimsier or it doesn't feel as well insulated as your top of the line previous gen LC.
You guys haven't been exposed to LC's that aren't top of the line before so keep that in mind.
For example a base 300 has less sound deadening, different glass and so on vs a fully loaded 300.
So you can imagine the 250 would also cut down on certain things, not because its worse no but because you have to remember the starting price point and the fact that this isn't the top of the line of the top of the line like you used to get before.
Me personally, I don't care much for that stuff - a new rig is a new rig at the end of the day. Just don't be surprised that's all im saying, take things for what they are.
Think of it abit like when we compare the sounded deadening and quality of material of the regular LC vs LX. The more expensive top of the line vehicle obviously is just a better place to be inside generally.
As for the pros of moving to a 250, don't forget its new, and it will feel nimbler to driver and easier to handle around town with more power and better fuel economy.
My 2014 LX for example is much quieter inside than my base LC 300. Do I say the LC300 sucks because of it? Ofcourse I can't because it is not a direct comparison as I am sure an LX 600 would be quieter than my 2014 LX..
David must be reading this tread![]()
David must be reading this tread