Bolt on turbo kit (13 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

ahhhh... I'm a little less shocked now :eek: Still a great number 👍
 
Stock Before 121awhp and 170ft/lbs
TRD SC 155awhp and 238ft/lbs
Wits End TC 214awhp and 277ft/lbs


Almost 100awhp and over 100ft/lbs of torque at the wheels.

View attachment 1955588


HOLY MOTHER OF SWEET BABY JESUS!!!!!!!!!

1955620

View attachment 1955618
 
Last edited:
sorry for the newb quewstion but two springs are needed to work tandomly?
 
None of that will need to be addressed by the end user. That is all part of the tuning process. Using multiple springs inside the waste gate is how Tial sets their pressure so yes 2 springs work fine and in some cases you use as many as 4 springs. But again the end user will not have anything to do with the springs.

MVRspc.png


sorry for the newb quewstion but two springs are needed to work tandomly?
 
Last edited:
Yes, the entire point of the bolt on turbo kit was to create something that works with stock fueling. :)

I'm sure all this info will be in the instructions, but this level was ok with the stock fueling?

I feel like all the on the fencers are calling their banks right now....
 
The intake air temps on 3 back to back pulls did not change the HP/Torque numbers. The only time you are going to see higher numbers with an intercooler is when the temps are hot. So they wouldn't change in this situation, if it is 105 degree summer day you likely won't see these numbers and an intercooler at that point would get you back closer to them.

Woah .... Awesome. Any estimates how the numbers would be with an intercooler
 
Yep all trucks had the same gears, the differences were simply, no turbo, adding the turbo and running against the previously SC'd truck.

Same differential gears too?
 
Dyno #s are in for the Turbo

Stock Before 121awhp and 170ft/lbs
TRD SC 155awhp and 238ft/lbs
Wits End TC 214awhp and 277ft/lbs

So, at my elevation of 7,000', using 3% power loss per 1000' = 21% loss. So that equates to 25 hp loss at elevation, which means I'm using up a whopping 96 hp to move my 7k phat arse around. :bang:
 
Yeah it is hard to say but you are for sure making less than the stock 121awhp and 170ft/lbs that people at sea level are seeing. I would bet you are just over 100-110awhp. The people at elevation certainly have the most to gain adding a turbo.

Dyno #s are in for the Turbo

Stock Before 121awhp and 170ft/lbs
TRD SC 155awhp and 238ft/lbs
Wits End TC 214awhp and 277ft/lbs

So, at my elevation of 7,000', using 3% power loss per 1000' = 21% loss. So that equates to 25 hp loss at elevation, which means I'm using up a whopping 96 hp to move my 7k phat arse around. :bang:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom