I'm surprised in shifted at 5k rpm. Would have thought it would go higher. I had an '06 GTO with the LS2. Loved that engine, pulled like a freight train up to 6500 rpm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I'm surprised in shifted at 5k rpm. Would have thought it would go higher. I had an '06 GTO with the LS2. Loved that engine, pulled like a freight train up to 6500 rpm
My tach is actually off by roughly 10% at 2k, so I'm assuming it's off up there as well. And the odd thing is I've re-checked the math about six times.. HPTuners thinks it's producing a 4-cyl tach output, my SGI-5 does think it's converting 4-cyl to 6-cyl..
I have a spare tach module I'm going to swap in to see if that's the problem. It does jump around a bit in the mid 2ks so I think it might be failing.
I think the "truck" L92 has different cam profile and rev limits than the LS3 it is based off of. The intake manifold is VERY different.
I think it's safe to say the biggest risk in terms of reliability is the swap itself. Meaning, how well put together was the wiring harness you used? Do coolant/fuel/evap lines fit well and not pull on fittings? Exhaust heat shielding to avoid radiant heat issues? Most of these issues are far more likely to present themselves than the reliability of the actual engine. The LS family of engines routinely go 300k.. my "gut" feeling from about a year of research is that while they are more than reliable enough for our uses, they are not QUITE as durable as a 1FZ.. but then what else is? The good thing is that any problems you do have.. aside from any custom parts (bring them to mexico) just about everything else is available widely, since SO MANY of the chevy trucks were built. Certain parts for these engines are easier to get than for the 1FZ.
As to which engine is most reliable.. avoid "AFM" (aka DoD).. the active fuel management regime that shuts down half of the engine when cruising. The special lifters for this are known to fail. VVT (variable valve timing) seems to work fine for a long time.. and even if it fails it won't disable the truck. Try and get a truck engine vs car so the alternator is up high. This also allows use of a mechanical fan if you want to go that route. Beyond that much of the architecture is very similar so "which" engine kindof applies to all.
If you went with a vanilla genIII iron block 5.3 and 4L60E they are EVERYWHERE. Also since it is genIII you can use the "f-body" oil pan without problems. Many GenIV have a secondary oil pressure bypass that is in the pan, and it's difficult to mod the f-body pan to accomodate this valve.
Just an update on pans, the gen IV half ton 4x4 Silverado oil pans fit fin in an 80....
F body pan not needed.
Sorry for lack of new pictures my 80 project is on hold for summer, I have posted a few of the pan and diff clearance.Lift? Engine position? How much clearance?
Has anyone done the swap into an OBD2 Truck and had to get it smogged? If so, any issues running the GM VIN in your jurisdiction? There seems to be some issues with people in OBD2 Jeeps which are starting to run into issues. I'd like to do this conversion in my 97, but getting them to pass smog seems challenging depending on where you live (Phoenix).
Your work in the BCM integration is inspiring, I too will be using a BCM, for all those items, I will also be including the Silverado instrument cluster for full gauges and DIC.
To improve low range shift points I plan to use either an arduino to send CAN messages or use a TCCM to do that job.
Thank you for pioneering deeper swap refinements
Good job sleuthing this out! How or are you going to integrate cruise with the Toyota cruise stalk?
Good job sleuthing this out! How or are you going to integrate cruise with the Toyota cruise stalk?
IT WILL WORK (but not yet). For now I'm using the cruise switch out of an escalade basically zip-tied to the console.
If I'm thinking this through correctly I should be able to make the GM cruise work with the toyota stalk.. will require moving a couple of the wires, adding a resistor to the input circuit, and replacing all of the other resistors. Also I THINK the power switch is momentary which means it can't be used like the stock GM power switch, and the best solution will simply be to have the cruise system on at all times. Also no indicator light..
Either way.. I won't have time to do any of this stuff until august. Needless to say I'll post.
Edit: I went ahead and ordered the resistors so they'll be here when I get back. Values can be found on the GM EWD posted above. 1/4watt size is what appears to be in the toyota stalk.
His gen3 system was pretty different though.. needing to convert a single wire multi-resistance signal from the Toyota stalk to triggering a few different wires for different functions.
In a gen4 using the BCM it is also a resistor ladder like Toyota, only the "ladder" climbs a different way and has different resistors.
With the right expertise and planning a chip could probably easily be used for a plug-in solution to make the Toyota stalk control the GM cruise.. it's just that in my case I know more about replacing the resistors than I do setting up a logic chip.