- Thread starter
- #261
have 4:56 which should work out well. another mud member had the same engine tranny combo and he went from 4:11 to 4:56 and said it was perfect
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
have 4:56 which should work out well. another mud member had the same engine tranny combo and he went from 4:11 to 4:56 and said it was perfect
Whether u build it for rocks or sandy and muddy hills it will affect how it climbs. Lots of guys run rear tanks though for more distance. More than likely whatever springs u run will handle the weight of a rear tank fine. Just keep in mind as I mentioned earlier u can get a long range tank that mounts under the front seats if u want. Man a fre sells it.most of my style off road is going to be adventure trails that i want range for. I'll be doing trails that have lots of steep muddy creek crossings and sandy hills. not much for rocks in my part of the world. I may branch out later into rocks but this rig is supposed to be a very capable truck that I can drive to the trail. that's why I thought the bigger tank would be nice plus i like the idea of it being outside the cab. with good springs I should be able to handle the weight back there no?
as for anti wrap bar my thoughts were I've seen guys with low gears snap a pinion accidently by loading it climbing a hill. now it's a mistake to let the rear compress as you hit the gas and I dont drive like that but I'd hate to do all this work and then find I wish I had it later. I'm not going to have crazy power but good low end torque with 4:56. am I over killing this idea? the rest of my build is overkill!!