Winter snorkel issue

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

I was only worried about the original Safari ram jet snorkel head and NOT the pre cleaner getting snow in it, because that is what it is there for. But that Sy-klone unit looks pretty kick ass!
 
They're reasonably priced as well, I paid under $100 for the model I have this past summer, zero maintenance so far. Never had it pop off in the bush. I didn't buy the mounting kit, I used a heavy rubber tube with a couple of hose clamps, works great, looks proportional with the vehicle as well.
Precleaner 001.jpg
Precleaner 002.jpg
 
I have a Safari Snorkel, the 9000R pre-cleaner that I'm using has 3" diameter mounting hole so it was too big to go in where the safari intake was removed.
What I'm calling a rubber tube is actually a deflection joint we had left over from a bridge job with a 3" ID, which is a little bigger than the snorkel, so I wrapped 3m rubber splicing tape where I wanted the rubber tube to stop to seal the gap, hose clamped it there stuck the Sy klone unit in the top and clamped it there as well. It's not beautiful but it works and you don't really notice the size difference. The black tape you see is covering the bottom hose clamp, kind of stuck out like a sore thumb without it.
Rubber Extension 001.jpg
Rubber Extension 002.jpg
 
snorkel

This is off the topic but related; I drove back from California yesterday thru much rain/snow and the smaller Donaldson pre cleaner I put on recently, filled with water 2 times. Got so I would empty the plastic (fish) bowl when I unlocked/locked my hubs... Never happened using the larger sized pre cleaner-seems the force of suction pulls the falling rain drops into the pre cleaner and it builds up fast in heavy rain.
Strange looks from pedestrians when they saw they water in it too.
 
I have a sump on my snorkel(s) to catch any water that get into the head. With the deep water and severe splashing we get sometimes I figured it was worth doing as a test if nothing else.

I have not captured much water in the sump even when doing days of multiple crossing or for that matter even when purposely creating as much splash as I can (playing). However when the rig was on the trailer being towed through rainstorms I did catch a surprising amount in the sump.

This was with a forward facing snorkel head with no water diverting baffling. With a forward facing head that did have a diversion baffle, I ran the highway through all day rainstorms with no water collecting in the sump at all. This setup also had no water in the sump after days on the trail and dozens of water crossing (but not a lot of sever splashing) during the Trek


Mark...
 
Last edited:
I have a Safari Snorkel, the 9000R pre-cleaner that I'm using has 3" diameter mounting hole so it was too big to go in where the safari intake was removed.

Did you have them size the pre-cleaner? I found a calculator on line, and it says the 13BT will need 636 CFM, using standard values. Could probably bump that down to a 2 in the volumetric efficiency section, but that still says 424CFM. Air flow (CFM)

Sy-Klone International: Series 9000 Precleaner Models

gb
 
Did you have them size the pre-cleaner? I found a calculator on line, and it says the 13BT will need 636 CFM, using standard values. Could probably bump that down to a 2 in the volumetric efficiency section, but that still says 424CFM. Air flow (CFM)

At the time, I just bought the last one they had in stock, (yeah I know) installed it and I haven't noticed any difference performance wise, over the Safari intake.

In checking their sizing chart, I may have to move up a size or two after I install my turbo http://www.sy-klone.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Category_Code=S9-PRC
 
Last edited:
If you run a 1HDT or 1HZ with with turbo then the safari snorkel will not allow enough airflow. I know they are building a bigger snorkel for the 1HDT and the 1HZ turbo - but for over 12PSI it still wont flow enough air for the engine = right from teh mouths of safari to me.

Merry xmas!
 
If you run a 1HDT or 1HZ with with turbo then the safari snorkel will not allow enough airflow. I know they are building a bigger snorkel for the 1HDT and the 1HZ turbo - but for over 12PSI it still wont flow enough air for the engine = right from teh mouths of safari to me.

Merry xmas!

Louie,
Right now I´m running a afari head on a 3"SS tube snorkel. That will not allow enough airflow for my HZ once the turbo is up and running?
John
 
I can't say for sure because I really don't know what that would flow, but I doubt it would, and I doubt that your airbox and airbox to turbo routing is sufficient as well. Don't egt me wrong it will work but will be restrictive especially if you run over 12 pounds.

Whe I told safari that I was running 15 pounds they said they won't have anything that will flow enough air for that. So I am making a 4 inch aluminum with custom airbox and large diameter Unifilter for max airflow - I also feel I'll be able to seal it better than the factory set up.

The new safari 1HDT snorkel will suffice up to 12 pounds iirc.
 
greg,
have you ever checked the factory or safari set up for flow?

No, I have not. If anyone has any info, post it up.

lshobie, good info thanks.

gb
 
I would put my bet in the air box .. and maybe a nice upgrade would be the 100 series air box .. that's much bigger ..
 
More Info for 13BT

Did you have them size the pre-cleaner? I found a calculator on line, and it says the 13BT will need 636 CFM, using standard values. Could probably bump that down to a 2 in the volumetric efficiency section, but that still says 424CFM. Air flow (CFM)

At the time, I just bought the last one they had in stock, (yeah I know) installed it and I haven't noticed any difference performance wise, over the Safari intake.

In checking their sizing chart, I may have to move up a size or two after I install my turbo Sy-Klone International: Series 9000 Precleaner Models



Since these SY-KLONE pre-cleaners use a spinning impellor to eject foreign debris they need to be sized for the minimum and maximum engine airflow to work properly. Judging by the relatively low airflow range of these units, I would guess they have been designed more for normally aspirated diesels which have a narrower airflow range and /or industrial diesel that operate within a narrow RPM range.

Estimated Volumetric efficiency (VE) for 13 BT

The Airflow calculator site says a normally aspired diesel has a VE of 0.9. I have increased my maximum boost to 12 psi, so that should increase volumetric efficiency by 1.8 times (1 + 12psi /14.7psi) times the 0.9 VE which equals 1.635. Stock boost should be (1+ 6psi/14.7 psi) times the 0.9 VE equals 1.267.

These are the values I have used below for the 13BT, which are subject to change.

CFM by RPM (12 psi boost)
900 RPM = 49 ft3/min ( no boost)
1,500 RPM = 147 ft3/min
2,000 RPM = 196 ft3/min
2,500 RPM = 245 ft3/min
3,000 RPM = 294 ft3/min
3,500 RPM = 344 ft3/min

CFM by RPM (6 psi ‘stock’ boost)
900 RPM = 49 ft3/min( no boost)
1,500 RPM = 114 t3/min
2,000 RPM = 152 ft3/min
2,500 RPM = 190 ft3/min
3,000 RPM = 228 ft3/min
3,500 RPM = 266 ft3/min

CFM by RPM (0 boost)
900 RPM = 49 ft3/min
1,500 RPM = 81 ft3/min
2,000 RPM = 108 ft3/min
2,500 RPM = 135 ft3/min
3,000 RPM = 162 ft3/min
3,500 RPM = 189ft3/min

SY-KLONE airflows:
From the SY-KLONE site we see that:
9000 R (with the 3” intake) has airflow capacities of 50 to 120 ft3/min. (Too small)
9001 (with the 4” intake) has airflow capacities of 100 to 275 ft3/min.( Right size)
SY-KLONE model 9001 R (with the 4” intake) has airflow capacities of 275 to 350 ft3/min.( too largea nd too narrow a range)

Conclusions

For most off-road (1,500 -2,000 RPM) and highway operation (2,000 to 2,800 RPM) the 9001 model (4" intake) will operate properly for stock and increased boost engines (up to 12 psi).
The model 9001 would be the “best” fit for the stock 13BT covering a RPM range of 1,200 to over 3,500 RPM.

If there is better information about the 13BT airflow requirements let me know, as this may change the conclusions.
 
so, now i have issue with the calculations and real life application.
if the flow needs a 4" pipe then how do you allow for the 3" pipe from the airbox to the turbo? the turbo inlet is 2 1/2" how do you increase this to allow for the needed airflow?

in reality, the greatest restriction will be at the turbo inlet on most Toyota diesel applications. next is the tube from the air box to the turbo.

<scratching head>
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom