Windshield replacement challenges; need rivets part # (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Well, ^that^ is a vote for DIY on the rivets and trim. wow
 
I called my dealer and asked where they have glass done - specifically for the 100 Series. The service guy recommended the place they take any cars that come in and they already knew the deal with all the rivets etc.

On an unrelated note, on my 06, I lifted up the thin rubber strip and found this. What's the easiest way to cut the little tail off the rivet? All the others are fine :hmm:

rV1jnUz.jpeg
You may be able to wiggle the tail enough to fatigue it and snap it off.
 
The other option is to ask them to install the glass then handle all the trim work yourself. As crazy as it sounds, I'd be very tempted to go this route especially if they're installing it at my house. It would take me 3x as long but at least I'd know how it was all put together.
I will need to do that if I ever need to replace a windshield. There is no way a local glass shop will get it right. However, there is a guy in Dallas (6 hour drive) that knows what he is doing.
 
Did the trim and rivets myself when I had the windshield replaced in August. Not a bad job, I used several small nuts stacked together wrapped in heat shrink as a spacer to keep the rivets flush with the trim as the large head on my rivet gun would not fit in the channel (tip found somewhere on 'mud). And cardboard between the gun and windshield!
 
I think you'll need 4 per side. To keep things interesting, @HoustonFj80 used Toyota PN: 90269-06013.

Sizes per his notes:
90269-04053 factory rivets (3.2mm)
90269-06013 (4.8mm)
90269-05034 (4.9mm) (size per measurements found on a Russian website)
75547-51021 (???mm)

My old thread that evolved into a conversation about rivets.

Part number 90269-05034 comes in at 4.8/4.9mm (and 18mm in length, with a double crush zone for a larger contact area). The top part of the rivet needs to be sanded down slightly to fit in the slot in the moulding. These should be the go-to if oversized rivets are needed.

90269-06013 are actually wider than the 05034, at around 5.4mm in width. They are much shorter too, making the final contact area smaller. I’d say avoid these unless absolutely necessary.
 
Part number 90269-05034 comes in at 4.8/4.9mm (and 18mm in length, with a double crush zone for a larger contact area). The top part of the rivet needs to be sanded down slightly to fit in the slot in the moulding. These should be the go-to if oversized rivets are needed.

90269-06013 are actually wider than the 05034, at around 5.4mm in width. They are much shorter too, making the final contact area smaller. I’d say avoid these unless absolutely necessary.
Solid tech, thanks for adding this.
 
Part number 90269-05034 comes in at 4.8/4.9mm (and 18mm in length, with a double crush zone for a larger contact area). The top part of the rivet needs to be sanded down slightly to fit in the slot in the moulding. These should be the go-to if oversized rivets are needed.

90269-06013 are actually wider than the 05034, at around 5.4mm in width. They are much shorter too, making the final contact area smaller. I’d say avoid these unless absolutely necessary.

The suffix portion of the part number: -05/-06 indicate the nominal diameter in Toyota standard part numbering: Ergo, your measuring results.
 
The suffix portion of the part number: -05/-06 indicate the nominal diameter in Toyota standard part numbering: Ergo, your measuring results.

Thanks @OGBeno, so it totally makes sense that the diameter moves up when you transition from:

90269-04... 3.2mm diameter
90269-05... 4.9mm diameter
90269-06... 5.4mm diameter (per @tesq above)

Do any of the final 3 numbers in the suffix speak to length or is it not that simple?
 
Thanks @OGBeno, so it totally makes sense that the diameter moves up when you transition from:

90269-04... 3.2mm diameter
90269-05... 4.9mm diameter
90269-06... 5.4mm diameter (per @tesq above)

Do any of the final 3 numbers in the suffix speak to length or is it not that simple?

Read all you want....

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom