- Thread starter
- #21
Happen to know what sensor PN that is? It’s 280-0117 by the looks of what I found searching for it, but that’s discontinued reman.Get the starter installed correctly with a Denso reman directly purchased from Toyota
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Happen to know what sensor PN that is? It’s 280-0117 by the looks of what I found searching for it, but that’s discontinued reman.Get the starter installed correctly with a Denso reman directly purchased from Toyota
Thanks. Grabbed one from Serra. $89, $60 core charge. Not bad28100-60070-84
Factory remain from toyota arrived today…looks identicalThe thing that I don’t understand is the degree of incompetence that it took to rebuild the starter like this. The nose cone is half shielded, to support the Bendix shaft. So the rebuilder (or the mechanic) would have had to install the cone 180 out of rotation to create this clusterf*ck.
Once you get the starter out of the bellhousing, this will make more sense to you.
(Edit) It’s possible that there is just enough eccentricity between the cone and the armature that it is putting the Bendix in a bind. THAT could cause the Bendix to whine, or worse, damage teeth on the flywheel.![]()
There is no nose cone on either starter. Toyota reman was sent exactly how mine was pulled, without. I’ve already installed the new one, guess we will see what happens when I drive it this weekend.2 wrongs don't make it right, however 3 lefts will. Compare the front nose cone orientation - that is what clocks the unit.
Depends on what you call correctly. The new one installs in the same position that the old one did. Without a cone housing, there isn’t an issue. Someone said it was upside down, so once I removed the original, I tried it “right side up” that created a large gap opening at the bell housing. The only way for it to install and not gap is to be “upside down”will the "new" one bolt in correctly?
I thought you stated early in the post the original one wouldn't.
It's a round hole?Depends on what you call correctly. The new one installs in the same position that the old one did. Without a cone housing, there isn’t an issue. Someone said it was upside down, so once I removed the original, I tried it “right side up” that created a large gap opening at the bell housing. The only way for it to install and not gap is to be “upside down”
Yes. There’s pictures on page one of this thread.It's a round hole?
Appreciate the different perspective. Just went out and double checked, everything is good there.Could also be your transfer case shifter mount is loose and the bolts from front drive shaft are rubbing on it. I'm in the process of installing twin shifters and one of the mounts is very close to the front driveshaft bolts.
The hole is the correct size. This is how this starter is made to fit in. The whole back-and-forth started because a few think the solenoid should be stuck on top instead of the bottom. If I rotate this starter around to show how they think it should be, then no it does not fit.if I understand correctly, the hole the starter fits into is larger than the bosses on the starter?
the starter should fit fairly snug in the hole.
question is what bellhousing did they use in Central America?
apparently it is working.