Really? like what? You’re telling me that the axle, frame, control arms, etc are weaker/smaller?Look underneath…..it’s a joke. Evidence of cost cutting and poor engineering everywhere.
I need to peak under one!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Really? like what? You’re telling me that the axle, frame, control arms, etc are weaker/smaller?Look underneath…..it’s a joke. Evidence of cost cutting and poor engineering everywhere.
That’s a joke, right? Absolute piece of junk.Really? like what? You’re telling me that the axle, frame, control arms, etc are weaker/smaller?
I need to peak under one!
IIf I was in the market for a truck, then I would buy Ford F150 Hybrid with Pro Power 7.2kW generator. Period. No argument needed. It is probably the most useful vehicle on the planet. 24 MPG. 12k tow capability. Luxurious. And can power your whole darn house in a power outage!!
That’s a joke, right? Absolute piece of junk.
They use steel frames….I
geez, they still dip those frames! It will rust asap. Did you notice the wax bubbles on bottom of rear frame. I like the fact the Ford f-150 uses aluminum frames.
Which Ford Trucks Have Aluminum Bodies?
Here's a look at the modern Ford catalog and which of the company's pickup truck models have bodies built entirely out of aluminum.www.motorbiscuit.com
Yeah, I meant bodiesThey use steel frames….
Have you checked the prices for those? If they aren’t ground into dust yet they make 200 prices seem reasonable.or buy an early 2000’s (pre Def) diesel Ford or Ram. Most likely a 2500 and 2WD.
That’s a joke, right? Absolute piece of junk.
Many of my buddies are unloading their extra vehicles with these crazy prices. My cousin sold his very clean 2003 Ram 2500 diesel 125k miles for $42k. He was pretty sure that was $7-10k more then he paid for it new 19 years ago.Have you checked the prices for those? If they aren’t ground into dust yet they make 200 prices seem reasonable.
I’m not so sure the frame is beefier. It appears to be thinner with not near the lateral reinforcement of the cruiser.Thanks for that link. Outside of the frame height for it's primary mission as a load bearing truck, the suspension parts and various structural elements look like toys in comparison. Considering the cruiser is shorter and generally smaller than a full size truck, it's that much more robustness.
Have you looked under the newer Navigator? Curious to hear your thoughts on it. I’m guessing it’s a Ford Expedition frame.I’m not so sure the frame is beefier. It appears to be thinner with not near the lateral reinforcement of the cruiser.
Once you look under a Cruiser and see plastic/metal guards specific to wiring harnesses, brake lines, and other sensitive components coupled with the shear size of everything. ….You see how other manufacturers cut costs.
On the GM, I noticed the exhaust routed directly under the transmission which can’t be good for heat soak. The Cruiser single piece banjo rear axle as opposed to the 3 piece rear axle of the GM. The list goes on and on,……
That’s a joke, right? Absolute piece of junk.
2WD is the key. 4WD doubles the price around here. Buy a long bed and a manual transmission for the best deal.Have you checked the prices for those? If they aren’t ground into dust yet they make 200 prices seem reasonable.
2009 was the last pre-DEF model year for diesel light duty trucks in the US. Running costs, maintenance, and emissions related repairs skyrocket after that. For a working hauling truck, pre-MY2010 diesel is the sweet spot.I would lean towards a 2011-2012 because that’s when most of the 3/4 and 1 ton pickups got rollover stability control, which was a significant safety upgrade. Fatality statistics bear this out. Vehicles without it tend to rollover and rollovers tend to kill people.
If I was forced to build an ultimate pickup, I’d probably get an extended cab 2008 or so tundra, have the frame boxed in, and swap in a 200 series transfer case.
But the thing about pickups is that a 200 is basically a super short wheelbase 4 door pickup with an integrated camper shell, third row, and more sound deadening material…which, when coupled with a nice trailer, exceeds the overall utility of a pickup IMO.
I just sold my 2020 Tundra TRD Pro And bought a 2021 HEHave any of you current LC200 USA owners considered adding a new Tundra to your garage or switching to one? Curious since I have been enamored with the LC200 for a while and need a newer vehicle but am also considering the new Tundra.
Thank you in advance!
07+ will still have a DPF though right? NOx reduction handled with LNT vs SCR of the DEF rigs, but still a lot of extra egr and other complexity compared to 06 and prior..2009 was the last pre-DEF model year for diesel light duty trucks in the US. Running costs, maintenance, and emissions related repairs skyrocket after that. For a working hauling truck, pre-MY2010 diesel is the sweet spot.
Is it possible to remove all the emissions nonsense from a 2012 so you get the upgraded safety equipment?2009 was the last pre-DEF model year for diesel light duty trucks in the US. Running costs, maintenance, and emissions related repairs skyrocket after that. For a working hauling truck, pre-MY2010 diesel is the sweet spot.
There is a big market for “deletes” on these vehicles. The epa/carb has been tracking down the companies that produce them but the demand is still there.. which means a supply will usually emerge.Is it possible to remove all the emissions nonsense from a 2012 so you get the upgraded safety equipment?
I didn’t know about the lower compression rate stuff. Too bad.There is a big market for “deletes” on these vehicles. The epa/carb has been tracking down the companies that produce them but the demand is still there.. which means a supply will usually emerge.
Thing is even when they are deleted there is still more stuff to break, and the engines were designed for the emissions stuff with things like lower compression ratios, which make them not quite as efficient as the older engines.
Yeah I suspect those fundamental design changes required by the emissions junk is a major reason engine builders wouldn’t make emissions-free power units for fire apparatus even if they were allowed to. They’ve invested so heavily in optimizing the combustion chamber and valve ports for that CR so that removing the emissions stuff alone wouldn’t result in the efficiency gains they could achieve.I didn’t know about the lower compression rate stuff. Too bad.
Perfect truck would be something like a classic 6bt dropped into a modern pickup with modern safety features intact/functional. Get the safety and the engine simplicity.
I think that late 90’s Cummins was the perfect “big” engine.
I’ve researched here and there about Cummins drop in’s…they tend to nix all the traction control safety stuff (like rollover stability control).
Just thought of something else. The right person could do it.I didn’t know about the lower compression rate stuff. Too bad.
Perfect truck would be something like a classic 6bt dropped into a modern pickup with modern safety features intact/functional. Get the safety and the engine simplicity.
I think that late 90’s Cummins was the perfect “big” engine.
I’ve researched here and there about Cummins drop in’s…they tend to nix all the traction control safety stuff (like rollover stability control).